지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In face of the 21centry, scholars in Korean literature are forced to stand the influence of the capital and the constantly changing conditions. I believe that we are at the point of seeking for a new paradigm and adopting new methodolgies that fit it, and no one deny the need for interdisciplinary approaches with other academic fields.
First and foremost, we are trying to find out the linkings between the studies of classics and modern literary works, focusing on their structural continuity and alternation in the fundamental elements, such as the sense of beauty, the consensus of genre, or national identity, not merely adopting the techniques or the texts of classics.
Secondly, it cannot be too much to emphasize on the communication
between Korean literature and Korean linguistics, for we have several reasons to gain an access to them interdisciplinarily: they share the same object to study, i.e., the Korean language, and the literature studies are inevitably based on the linguistic interpretation. For systematic cooperation between the two fields of academia, firstly the professors as well as the researchers majoring in the Korean literature and linguistics gather in regular basis, and in addition, it is important to select students who are familiar with both of the fields.
Thirdly, to put the studies regarding women's literature in the right place in the history of Korean literature should be carried out, and this means to recover the wholeness of the history of Korean literature by means of adding the missing part of it to. It must encourage the exploration on the women's literature, which have made ample discussion, but borne relatively little amount
of results.
Lastly, the studies of Korean literature should go beyond its boundary, 'literary works', and willingly extend its interests to the culture. Specifically, it is desirable for us to be concerned with interaction between the literature and the cultural recepients, and also interested in popularity, and day-to-day lives.
Besides we should positively correspond to the cultural changes as well as those in the environment and the media in this era. In my opinion these kinds of researches will lead us to re-identify the theories of modern literature as ones with cultural reality, and further to make creative expressions of themselves.
To conclude, the literature cannot live isolated without any interaction with other fields in the world. To actively deal with the changes today, and to reveal the creative forces it has, the literature should be a major motivation to develop a new concept of culture. For this purpose, we explore the way to overcome the disruption among a variety of areas, and endeavor to interact with those fields. Therefore, the scholars in Korean literature should not only do the communicative research in the spheres of literature, but also do the integrative, interdisciplinary works with other people in other realms. The ultimate aim of literary studies will be to converge into the studies as answers to what our life is, and to how to respond to it, in short, what 'culture' is. And we should pursue this until it can play an important role as social capital.
First and foremost, we are trying to find out the linkings between the studies of classics and modern literary works, focusing on their structural continuity and alternation in the fundamental elements, such as the sense of beauty, the consensus of genre, or national identity, not merely adopting the techniques or the texts of classics.
Secondly, it cannot be too much to emphasize on the communication
between Korean literature and Korean linguistics, for we have several reasons to gain an access to them interdisciplinarily: they share the same object to study, i.e., the Korean language, and the literature studies are inevitably based on the linguistic interpretation. For systematic cooperation between the two fields of academia, firstly the professors as well as the researchers majoring in the Korean literature and linguistics gather in regular basis, and in addition, it is important to select students who are familiar with both of the fields.
Thirdly, to put the studies regarding women's literature in the right place in the history of Korean literature should be carried out, and this means to recover the wholeness of the history of Korean literature by means of adding the missing part of it to. It must encourage the exploration on the women's literature, which have made ample discussion, but borne relatively little amount
of results.
Lastly, the studies of Korean literature should go beyond its boundary, 'literary works', and willingly extend its interests to the culture. Specifically, it is desirable for us to be concerned with interaction between the literature and the cultural recepients, and also interested in popularity, and day-to-day lives.
Besides we should positively correspond to the cultural changes as well as those in the environment and the media in this era. In my opinion these kinds of researches will lead us to re-identify the theories of modern literature as ones with cultural reality, and further to make creative expressions of themselves.
To conclude, the literature cannot live isolated without any interaction with other fields in the world. To actively deal with the changes today, and to reveal the creative forces it has, the literature should be a major motivation to develop a new concept of culture. For this purpose, we explore the way to overcome the disruption among a variety of areas, and endeavor to interact with those fields. Therefore, the scholars in Korean literature should not only do the communicative research in the spheres of literature, but also do the integrative, interdisciplinary works with other people in other realms. The ultimate aim of literary studies will be to converge into the studies as answers to what our life is, and to how to respond to it, in short, what 'culture' is. And we should pursue this until it can play an important role as social capital.
목차
1. 새로운 대응, 대화와 상호소통
2. 고전문학과 현대문학의 만남
3. 국문학과 국어학의 소통
4. 여성문학에 대한 연구의 강화
5. 문학을 통한 문화확장
6. 맺는말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
세계화 시대의 한국문학 : 세계문학과 지역문학의 좌표
국어국문학
2010 .08
-
우리 문학의 연구 현황과 전망
우리말글
2004 .08
-
The Influence of Chinese Literature on Korean Literature
Korea Journal
1972 .01
-
Korean Literature and Adjacent Literatures
Korea Journal
1982 .10
-
An Aspect of Korean Literature
Korea Journal
1984 .07
-
The Meaning of the City in Korean Literature
Korea Journal
1987 .05
-
해외 한인문학의 존재와 당위 : ‘한민족문학’ 범주의 설정을 제안하며
국어국문학
2009 .09
-
국문학의 대중화, 어떤 대중화인가?
어문학
2011 .12
-
한국고전문학 연구의 성과와 전망 : 2000년 이후를 중심으로
동서인문학
2008 .12
-
지역문학사 서술의 가능성과 방향
국어국문학
2006 .12
-
한국 현대문학 연구 60년의 회고와 전망
국어국문학
2012 .08
-
한국문학 연구의 미래
국어국문학
2004 .09
-
문학교육에서의 인지의 문제 - 문학의 순환적 위계화의 필요성과 가능성
문학교육학
2003 .01
-
일본문학의 한국적 수용과 특징 : 무라카미 하루키 소설과 ‘문화’번역
아시아문화연구
2007 .11
-
한겨레 문학사 기술(文學史 記述) 방법론 : 통일시대 문학사 접근을 위한 시론(試論)
어문론집
2002 .12
-
한국 현대문학 연구의 새로운 모색
국어국문학
2005 .09
-
1950년대 문학교육의 지형학
문학교육학
2007 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-014333687