지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Korea had been able to escape from absolute poverty level and maintain relatively equal distribution policies under the authoritarian rules with the help of economic growth and the increase of employment rate, The relatively reformist governments after democratization, however, has experienced a paradoxical situation in which the poverty and inequality level have been rather increasing compared to the authoritarian governments during which the poverty and inequality level was relatively tolerable.
A general assesment has been that it was economic crisis in 1997 and consequent large-scale unemployment that directly caused the rapid increase in poverty level under the Kim Dae Jung Administration, However, the poverty and inequality level increased despite the recovery of major macroeconomic indicators. Accordingly, it is inappropriate to argue that economic crisis caused the increase and duration of poverty and inequality.
The past authoritarian governments managed to sustain relatively equal distribution policies utilizing economic growth and employment increase as a way of complementing weakness in their legitimacy. Since the achievement of democratization, relative poverty became more important than absolute poverty, and relying on economic growth became insufficient to resolve poverty problems. The flexible labor market policy since the mid 1990s even increased the number of non-regular workers and this led to the increase of poverty despite the decrease in unemployment rate.
The main reason for such a situation can be found in the policy failures of democratic government more than anything else during the economic crisis. The overemphasis on economic growth led to the failure in shaping the macroeconomic policy frame including democratic distribution policy. Moreover, this failure even excluded democratic political process based on social consent that is
necessary to accomodate conflicts and competition naturally occurring during the economic crisis, ultimately resulting in the unilateral sacrifices of the lower class. The poverty problem in Korea after democratization requires a new approach to resolve it: it is quite different from the past because poverty now became a general problem of the working poor, and consequently it is not just a problem of specific class.
A general assesment has been that it was economic crisis in 1997 and consequent large-scale unemployment that directly caused the rapid increase in poverty level under the Kim Dae Jung Administration, However, the poverty and inequality level increased despite the recovery of major macroeconomic indicators. Accordingly, it is inappropriate to argue that economic crisis caused the increase and duration of poverty and inequality.
The past authoritarian governments managed to sustain relatively equal distribution policies utilizing economic growth and employment increase as a way of complementing weakness in their legitimacy. Since the achievement of democratization, relative poverty became more important than absolute poverty, and relying on economic growth became insufficient to resolve poverty problems. The flexible labor market policy since the mid 1990s even increased the number of non-regular workers and this led to the increase of poverty despite the decrease in unemployment rate.
The main reason for such a situation can be found in the policy failures of democratic government more than anything else during the economic crisis. The overemphasis on economic growth led to the failure in shaping the macroeconomic policy frame including democratic distribution policy. Moreover, this failure even excluded democratic political process based on social consent that is
necessary to accomodate conflicts and competition naturally occurring during the economic crisis, ultimately resulting in the unilateral sacrifices of the lower class. The poverty problem in Korea after democratization requires a new approach to resolve it: it is quite different from the past because poverty now became a general problem of the working poor, and consequently it is not just a problem of specific class.
목차
1.문제제기
2.빈곤문제의 구조변화
3.민주정부의 정치적 실패와 빈곤증가
4.새로운 문제로서 빈곤, 그리고 한국 민주주의
참고문헌
참고문헌 (34)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The End of Poverty
국제개발협력
2007 .02
-
경제위기 이후 빈곤의 특성과 결정요인
경제연구
2007 .01
-
빈곤에 대한 새로운 접근시각을 통해서 본 볼리비아 빈곤양상과 사회정책의 함의
중남미연구
2013 .10
-
한국의 빈곤, 왜 감소하지 않는가? - 1990년대 이후 빈곤 추이의 분석 -
한국사회복지학
2004 .11
-
A Comparative Study on Three Poverty Measures : Poverty Rate, Poverty Gap and Squared Poverty Gap
사회과학연구
2007 .04
-
What Determines Poverty in Korea in the 1990s?
Korea and the World Economy
2002 .03
-
노인가구의 소득빈곤과 다차원빈곤에 관한 연구
Human Ecology Research
2018 .01
-
빈곤의 다차원성 : 이론적 논쟁의 검토
비판사회정책
2015 .08
-
An Investigation of the Determinants of Household Vulnerability and Poverty in Korea
Korea and the World Economy
2015 .08
-
일본의 정권교체와 복지개혁 : 실업ㆍ빈곤대책을 중심으로
아세아연구
2011 .03
-
한국의 신빈곤현상과 탈빈곤정책에 관한 연구 : 근로빈곤층(the working poor)의 실태를 중심으로
한국사회복지학
2005 .05
-
Impact of Poverty on Economic Growth in Nigeria : A Public Opinion Perspective
Asian Journal of African Studies
2018 .08
-
Trends, Characteristics and inter - face of Prinary and Secondary Poverty in Urbam India
지역연구
1998 .06
-
Ethnicity and Chronic Poverty in Kenya : A Phenomenological Approach
Asian Journal of African Studies
2009 .02
-
우리나라에서의 경제성장과 빈곤의 관계 : 1982-2004년 도시가구를 중심으로
한국사회복지학
2006 .08
-
근로장애인의 빈곤이력과 빈곤재진입 분석
장애와 고용
2016 .05
-
Making sense of extreme poverty: An essay on the caveats of the 1.90-dollar international poverty line
OUGHTOPIA
2019 .11
-
새로운 도시빈곤으로서 근로빈곤층의 발생과 대책
한국지역지리학회지
2006 .12
-
충북지역 신빈곤의 실태와 탈빈곤대책의 방향
지역정책연구
2009 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한국의 세대간 사회이동 : 출생 코호트 및 성별 비교
계봉오
,
황선재
한국인구학
2016
.09
다중회귀 분석을 이용한 영화 흥행 예측
정회윤
,
양형정
한국컴퓨터정보학회 학술발표논문집
2013
.07
중소기업의 고용불안정성이 경영혁신에 미치는 영향 : 전략적 인적자원관리의 조절효과
배호영
대한경영학회지
2015
.08
한국과 일본 청년층의 빈곤요인에 대한 탐색적 연구
김수정
,
김영
한국사회정책
2013
.03
포털 뉴스서비스와 온라인 저널리즘의 지형 : 뉴스 유통의 구조 변동 혹은 권력 변화
김위근
한국언론정보학보
2014
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-014170476