메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국어문학회 어문학 어문학 통권 제83호
발행연도
2004.3
수록면
93 - 113 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper is concerned with how differently men and women use discourse maker which is known as a particular discourse maker shown only in spoken language. First, what difference do men and women show in the frequency of using discourse makers? What is the reason for this difference? I hope to obtain the answer through analyzing some data. Therefore, the things I would like to anticipate in this study are two fold: one is to investigate the differences between men's language and women's through the result of discourse marker according to gender and the other to analogize the recognizing of differences between men and women inductively.
In this study I analyze discourse makers by gender shown by middle and high school students' talking when they are alone. The following are the results.
(1) Men is higher than women in the frequency of discourse maker use.
(2) Men use more kinds of discourse makers than women and both men and women use 8 discourse makers in average.
(3) Men and women use ‘아/어/으’ discourse makers most.
(4) Men use ‘마’ more than women and woman use ‘머’ more than men.
(5) Women use more a interrogative discourse maker than men.
(6) Men use ‘그’ and ‘저’ more than women and use ‘이’ less than women in a demonstrative discourse maker.
(7) Women is higher than men in the frequency of conjunctional discourse maker.
(8) Men use ‘참’ and ‘딱’, which have the meaning of a degree originally, less than women and men use ‘막’, ‘인제’ and ‘마’ more than women, which are the discourse makers meaning space, time, or negation in an adverbial discourse maker.
(9) Men use ‘아’ more than women and use ‘어’ less than women in a nonverbal discourse maker.

목차

1. 들머리

2. 앞선 연구

3. 연구 방법

4. 조사 결과 및 해석

5. 마무리

참고문헌

Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-013791518