지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In historical writings, the historiography(史論) shows a historical view of the historiographer at first hand. Dongguktonggam was compiled in the middle of Seongjong(成宗) era, when Sarim(士林) had repulsed the royal merits relatives(勳戚). It can be said that Dongguktonggam is the thesaurus of historiographies since it collected 181 volumes of old historiography(舊史論) and 204 volumes of new historiography(新史論). Of these, new historiography illustrates very sharply the historical episteme of Sarim in that time because it was forged by the historiographers of Dongguktonggam and they were affiliated with Sarim.
This essay examined the historiography of Dongguktonggam focusing on new historiography and came to the following conclusions. Firstly, new historiography is dependent on the problematic affairs, but it does not overlap with old historiography and compensates for the omissions of old historiography.
Secondly, new historiography consists of the general survey(總評論), the investigation(考證論), and the praise and censure(褒貶論). Especially, 4 volumes of the general survey review one by on each kings unlike old historiography.
Thirdly, a great proportion of new historiography is the praise and censure which amounts to 188 volumes. The praise and censure is again subdivided into the loyalty(節義), the justification(名分), the legitimacy(正統), the expostulation(諫言), the exclusion of heterodoxy(闢異), the relationship to the stronger neighbors(事大交隣). These sub-articles is included into old historiography, but distinguish distinctly from it in terms of intensity of writings.
Fourthly, new historiography underscores particularly the expostulation, even though any neo-confusianist(性理學者) had
attached grat importance to it. This implies the political intentions of Sarim in Seongjo era who had repulsed the royal merits relatives through three Sa(司) of speech(言論).
Fifthly, the core theme of new historiography is the principle of moral justification(義理名分論) and the legitimism(正統論), that is, the fundamental social ideology of Neo-Confusianism(性理學). On the one hand, if he acted contrary to the legitimacy and the justification, he is subject to the praise and censure. On the other hand, if he kept to the loyalty, he is the loyalist. It is this point that new historiography put great emphasis on and separated new historiography from old one. This emphasis was simultaneously the ideological base by which Sarim attacked the royal merits relatives who had involved themselves in coup d'etat of Sejo(世祖) and the political self-confidence in their innocence.
This essay examined the historiography of Dongguktonggam focusing on new historiography and came to the following conclusions. Firstly, new historiography is dependent on the problematic affairs, but it does not overlap with old historiography and compensates for the omissions of old historiography.
Secondly, new historiography consists of the general survey(總評論), the investigation(考證論), and the praise and censure(褒貶論). Especially, 4 volumes of the general survey review one by on each kings unlike old historiography.
Thirdly, a great proportion of new historiography is the praise and censure which amounts to 188 volumes. The praise and censure is again subdivided into the loyalty(節義), the justification(名分), the legitimacy(正統), the expostulation(諫言), the exclusion of heterodoxy(闢異), the relationship to the stronger neighbors(事大交隣). These sub-articles is included into old historiography, but distinguish distinctly from it in terms of intensity of writings.
Fourthly, new historiography underscores particularly the expostulation, even though any neo-confusianist(性理學者) had
attached grat importance to it. This implies the political intentions of Sarim in Seongjo era who had repulsed the royal merits relatives through three Sa(司) of speech(言論).
Fifthly, the core theme of new historiography is the principle of moral justification(義理名分論) and the legitimism(正統論), that is, the fundamental social ideology of Neo-Confusianism(性理學). On the one hand, if he acted contrary to the legitimacy and the justification, he is subject to the praise and censure. On the other hand, if he kept to the loyalty, he is the loyalist. It is this point that new historiography put great emphasis on and separated new historiography from old one. This emphasis was simultaneously the ideological base by which Sarim attacked the royal merits relatives who had involved themselves in coup d'etat of Sejo(世祖) and the political self-confidence in their innocence.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 著論 동기와 과정
Ⅲ. 著論者 분석
Ⅳ. 史論의 分布와 內容 분석
Ⅴ. 맺음말
<부록：포폄론 188편> @는 최보의 사론, #는 최보 이외의 사론
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Trends in Western Historiography on Korea
Korea Journal
1999 .09
-
식민사관 비판론의 등장과 내재적 발전론의 형성
사학연구
2017 .03
-
Two Memories, Two Historiographies
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2019 .06
-
Historiography concerning Cognition of Reality
Korea Journal
1979 .01
-
『임나흥망사』를 통해 본 스에마츠 야스카즈의 역사관
역사비평
2020 .08
-
포스트모더니즘과 역사 서술: 그렉 드닝의 민족지적 역사
역사와 담론
2004 .12
-
Korean Historiography in the 20th Century : A Configuration of Paradigms
Korea Journal
2000 .03
-
1902年梁启超“史界革命”的再审视
중국사연구
2014 .01
-
누가의 수사학적 역사기술(Rhetorical Historiography)에 대한 소고 : 행 24:1-21을 중심하여
신학과세계
2001 .11
-
Aramaic Historiography
구약논단
2003 .04
-
실증사학의 ‘이념’ — 식민지 조선에 온 역사주의
인문논총
2019 .01
-
論經說義 敘事解經一一以夏姬之人物敘事 論《左傳》之解經模式
국제언어문학
2020 .04
-
전후(戰後) 일본에서의 조선사학의 개시와 사학사(史學史)상(像) : 1950~60년대를 중심으로
한국사연구
2011 .06
-
Mimana, A Problem in Korean Historiography
Korea Journal
1977 .08
-
Rethinking the Concept of Time : Modern Historical Consciousness and Historiography in Korean Society
Korea Journal
2001 .03
-
세계화시대에서 근대 사학사 서술을 어떻게 할 것인가 : 서구중심주의와 민족주의를 넘어서기 위한 하나의 시론
역사와 담론
2006 .12
-
Edomite Historiography
구약논단
2004 .04
-
현대 역사학 연구 동향에의 시각
통일인문학
2001 .09
-
역사서술은 사실의 발견인가, 허구의 창작인가?
韓國史學史學報
2008 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-013768571