메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

가마나무 (동국대학교, 동국대학교 대학원)

지도교수
최정자
발행연도
2019
저작권
동국대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수19

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Street travel is a big pleasure for travellers who can enjoy a variety of street attractions and experience special placeness through physical environment, activities, and interactions between place and humans including their own selves.

This study aims to investigate the impacts of place experience on aura and behavioral intentions from the perspectives of various stakeholders including travelers, merchants, and residents as subjects of the tourism system who experience place.

Moreover, a mediating effect of aura will be verified in the relationships between the place experience and behavioral intentions which was not tapped in the previous literature. In addition, this study will identify whether there will be differences between importance and satisfaction levels of Hwang-Ri-Dan Gil, Gyeongju as a traveller street perceived by respondents.
To accomplish the purpose of the research, a total of 500 questionnaires were conducted between April 27th and May 10th(a total of 14 days) with those who experienced the study area, Hwang-Ri-Dan Gil, consisting of travelers, merchants, local residents.

Out of 500, 482 questionnaires were used to proceed research analyses by removing disqualified questionnaires.

The results of the research analyses are as follows.

Firstly, the place experience, consisting of placeness, place identity and place authenticity, showed statistically significant impacts on aura.
Among the regression models, place identity(R2=.546) showed the best result of the explanation in the relationship with aura, followed by placeness(R2=.491) and place authenticity(R2=.446).

Secondly, there showed all adopted hypotheses results in the relationships between the place experience, consisting of placeness, place identity and place authenticity, and behavioral intention such as place loyalty and co-creating shared value(CSV) activities.

Among the regression models, while place identity(R2=.526) showed the best result of the explanation in the relationship with loyalty, followed by place authenticity(R2=.443) and placeness(R2=.404), place identity(R2=.275) showed the best result of the explanation in the relationship with CSV, followed by place authenticity(R2=.199) and placeness(R2=.183)

However, while symbolic and existential authenticity factors of place authenticity had statically significant impacts on place loyalty, objective authenticity did not have a significant impact on it.

As for the relationships between the place experience and support for the CSV activities, activities factor of placeness and existential authenticity factor of place authenticity did not have statistically significant impacts on support for the CSV activities.

Thirdly, it was proved that aura had statistically significant impacts on behavioral intentions, consisting of place loyalty and support for the CSV activities. Among the two regression models, aura showed better result of the explanation in the relationship with loyalty(R2=.314) than CSV(R2=.135).

Fourthly, aura was proved to have complete or partial mediating roles in the relationships between the place experience, consisting of placeness, place identity and place authenticity, and behavioral intentions, consisting of place loyalty and support for the CSV activities. 1)

As for the relationships between place experience and loyalth, aura showed partial mediating roles between placeness of physical and activity factors and place loyalty and a complete mediating role between emotional placeness and place loyalty. Aura showed partially mediating roles between place identity and place loyalty.

Lastly, aura partially mediated the relationships between symbolic and existential factors of place authenticity and loyalty, but did not show any mediating effect between objective authenticly and place loyalty. 2)
As for the relationships between placeness and support for the CSV activities, while aura showed partially mediating roles between placeness of physical and emotional factors and support for the CSV activities, aura did not mediate the relationship between activity factor of placeness and support for CSV.

Aura did not mediate the relationship between place identity and support for CSV.
Lastly, aura showed partial mediating impacts on support for CSV, but did not mediate the relationship between existential authenticly and support for CSV.

The results suggest meaningful insights for academic researchers and practitioners. For academic researchers, this research contributes to being a platform for similar research in the field of place experience, consisting of placeness, place identity and place authenticity, and behavioral intentions, consisting of place loyalty and support for the co-creating shared value activities.

Additionally, aura could play important roles as a mediating variable between place experience and behavioral intentions. This research also contributes to making paradigm shift of perceiving travellers as consumers and merchants and residents as producers into perceiving alll of the travellers, residents, and merchants as subjects of the tourism system.

All of these travellers, merchants and residents in this research were considered as subjects of the tourism system experiencing place. For practitioners, sincere thoughts and insights might be needed to perceive travelers, merchants and residents as main subjects or actors of experiencing cognitive and existential functions of place.

Ultimately, they have to try to involve those main actors or subjects of experiencing place to make and maintain the sustainable tourism eco-system.

For future research, a structural equation model will be used to test a good fit of the structural relationships among each of the place variables, consisting of placeness, place identity and place authenticity, aura, and behavioral intentions.

Furthermore, multi-group analyses will be conducted to test any differences among the subjects experiencing place in the structural relationships bewteen the variables.

목차

제1장 서 론 1
제1절 연구의 필요성 1
제2절 연구의 목적 5
제3절 연구의 수행체계 6
제2장 이론적 고찰 8
제1절 여행자 거리 8
1. 여행자 거리의 개념 8
2. 여행자 거리의 현황 9
3. 여행자 거리의 선행연구 11
제2절 장소경험 13
1. 장소성(Placeness) 13
1-1. 장소성의 개념 13
1-2. 장소성의 구성요소 16
1-3. 장소성의 선행연구 22
2. 장소정체성(Place Identity) 25
2-1. 장소정체성의 개념 25
2-2. 장소정체성의 구성요소 27
2-3. 장소정체성의 선행연구 30
3. 장소진정성(Place Authenticity) 32
3-1. 장소진정성의 개념 32
3-2. 장소진정성의 구성요소 34
3-3. 장소진정성의 선행연구 35
제3절 아우라(Aura) 38
1. 아우라의 배경과 개념 38
2. 아우라의 구성요소 41
3. 아우라의 선행연구 42
제4절 행동의도(Behavioral & Intention) 44
1. 로열티(Loyalty)의 개념과 구성요소 44
2. 공유가치창출(Co-Creating Shared Value)의 개념과 구성요소 46
3. 행동의도의 선행연구 51
제3장 연구방법 54
제1절 연구모형 및 가설설정 54
1. 연구모형 54
2. 가설설정 55
제2절 조사 및 분석방법 61
1. 조사대상지: 경주 황리단길의 과거와 현재 61
2. 표본설계 67
3. 설문지 구성 68
4. 분석방법 70
제4장 분석 결과 72
제1절 기술분석 72
1. 표본의 인구통계학적 특성 72
2. 여행자 거리 요소의 중요도와 만족도 간 대응표본 T검정 73
3. 측정도구의 신뢰도와 타당성 검증 74
4. 변수들 간의 상관관계분석 79
제2절 가설검증 80
1. 장소경험과 아우라의 관계 80
2. 장소경험과 행동의도의 관계 82
3. 아우라와 행동의도의 관계 87
4. 아우라의 매개효과 88
제5장 연구 결론 98
제1절 연구의 요약과 시사점 98
제2절 연구의 한계와 향후과제 102
참고문헌 104
설문지 113
ABSTRACT 118

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0