지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015
- 저작권
- 진주교육대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
이용수2
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
본 연구는 아동의 거부민감성과 우울, 자기조절이 폭식행동에 미치는 영향과
이러한 3가지 변인의 프로파일 유형에 따른 폭식행동의 차이를 알아보는데 목
적이 있다. 이를 위해 경상남도 소재 7개 초등학교 4~6학년 619명을 대상으로
아동용 거부민감성 척도, 아동우울검사, 자기조절능력 질문지, 폭식행동 질문지
를 실시하여 자료를 수집하였고 SPSS 20.0을 사용하여 분석하였다. 먼저 변인간
상관을 알아보고 3가지 변인 간에 상호작용이 나타나는 지를 알아보기 위해 회
귀분석을 실시하였으며 프로파일 유형을 도출하기 위해 군집분석을 실시하였다.
본 연구에서 도출한 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 거부민감성과 우울
은 폭식행동과 유의미한 정적 상관, 자기조절과 폭식행동은 부적 상관이 있는
것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 3가지 변인을 위계적 회귀분석 한 결과, 1단계에서는
거부민감성이 높고 자기조절이 낮을수록 폭식행동이 증가하였고, 2단계에서는
거부민감성과 우울, 우울과 자기조절이 상호작용하여 폭식행동에 영향을 주는
것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 군집분석을 통해 고위험, 우울, 거부민감성, 평범 및 자
기조절 유형으로 명명한 5가지 프로파일을 도출하였고 이러한 프로파일 간에
폭식행동과 하위영역인 식욕, 감정적 과식에서 전반적으로 유의미한 차이가 있
는 것으로 나타났다. 폭식행동은 거부민감성과 우울이 높고 자기조절 능력이
낮은 고위험 유형에서 가장 높은 반면에 거부민감성과 우울이 낮고 자기조절
능력이 높은 자기조절 유형에서 가장 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 또한 거부민감성
이 높고 우울과 자기조절은 평균 수준인 거부민감성 유형의 폭식행동 점수는
고위험 유형과 유의미한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다.
이러한 본 연구의 결과는 아동을 대상으로 거부민감성과 우울, 자기조절과
폭식행동의 관계를 경험적으로 확인하였고 폭식행동과 밀접한 관련이 있는 것
으로 밝혀진 3가지 변인의 상호관계를 통해 폭식행동을 설명하였다는 점에서
의미가 있다고 생각된다. 그러나 본 연구는 거부민감성으로 인해서 유발될 수
있을 뿐만 아니라 폭식행동과도 밀접한 관련이 있는 불안, 분노와 같은 부적
정서를 고려하지 않았으므로 이후 연구에서는 이러한 변인들을 통합적으로 다룰 필요가 있다고 생각된다.
이러한 3가지 변인의 프로파일 유형에 따른 폭식행동의 차이를 알아보는데 목
적이 있다. 이를 위해 경상남도 소재 7개 초등학교 4~6학년 619명을 대상으로
아동용 거부민감성 척도, 아동우울검사, 자기조절능력 질문지, 폭식행동 질문지
를 실시하여 자료를 수집하였고 SPSS 20.0을 사용하여 분석하였다. 먼저 변인간
상관을 알아보고 3가지 변인 간에 상호작용이 나타나는 지를 알아보기 위해 회
귀분석을 실시하였으며 프로파일 유형을 도출하기 위해 군집분석을 실시하였다.
본 연구에서 도출한 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 거부민감성과 우울
은 폭식행동과 유의미한 정적 상관, 자기조절과 폭식행동은 부적 상관이 있는
것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 3가지 변인을 위계적 회귀분석 한 결과, 1단계에서는
거부민감성이 높고 자기조절이 낮을수록 폭식행동이 증가하였고, 2단계에서는
거부민감성과 우울, 우울과 자기조절이 상호작용하여 폭식행동에 영향을 주는
것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 군집분석을 통해 고위험, 우울, 거부민감성, 평범 및 자
기조절 유형으로 명명한 5가지 프로파일을 도출하였고 이러한 프로파일 간에
폭식행동과 하위영역인 식욕, 감정적 과식에서 전반적으로 유의미한 차이가 있
는 것으로 나타났다. 폭식행동은 거부민감성과 우울이 높고 자기조절 능력이
낮은 고위험 유형에서 가장 높은 반면에 거부민감성과 우울이 낮고 자기조절
능력이 높은 자기조절 유형에서 가장 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 또한 거부민감성
이 높고 우울과 자기조절은 평균 수준인 거부민감성 유형의 폭식행동 점수는
고위험 유형과 유의미한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다.
이러한 본 연구의 결과는 아동을 대상으로 거부민감성과 우울, 자기조절과
폭식행동의 관계를 경험적으로 확인하였고 폭식행동과 밀접한 관련이 있는 것
으로 밝혀진 3가지 변인의 상호관계를 통해 폭식행동을 설명하였다는 점에서
의미가 있다고 생각된다. 그러나 본 연구는 거부민감성으로 인해서 유발될 수
있을 뿐만 아니라 폭식행동과도 밀접한 관련이 있는 불안, 분노와 같은 부적
정서를 고려하지 않았으므로 이후 연구에서는 이러한 변인들을 통합적으로 다룰 필요가 있다고 생각된다.
목차
국문초록 ··············································································································· ⅰⅠ. 서론1. 연구의 필요성과 목적···························································································· 12. 연구문제 ···················································································································· 6Ⅱ. 이론적 배경1. 폭식 행동·················································································································· 72. 거부민감성 ·············································································································· 153. 우울·························································································································· 184. 자기조절 ·················································································································· 215. 선행연구 분석 ········································································································ 24가. 거부민감성과 폭식 행동··················································································· 24나. 우울과 폭식 행동······························································································· 25다. 자기조절과 폭식 행동······················································································· 26Ⅲ. 연구방법1. 연구대상 ·················································································································· 282. 측정도구 ·················································································································· 283. 자료분석 ·················································································································· 32Ⅳ. 연구결과1. 변인 간 상관 ·········································································································· 342. 폭식행동 예측변인 간의 상호작용효과 ···························································· 343. 군집분석 프로파일································································································ 364. 판별분석 결과 ········································································································ 38Ⅴ. 논의 및 제언1. 논의·························································································································· 422. 결론 및 제언 ·········································································································· 44참고문헌 ··············································································································· 46Abstract ··················································································································· 58부 록 ····················································································································· 60
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0