지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015
- 저작권
- 경북대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
이용수2
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of the firms’ structural positions within social systems, particularly the effects of their status in technology space and access to structural holes in alliance networks, on technological innovation. While prior studies have found mixed results regarding the effects of structural holes on the firms’ innovation performance, I argue that status would negatively moderate the association between structural holes and innovation activities by substituting the information benefits and limiting the control benefits of structural holes. I examine my theory and hypotheses in the context of the U.S. biotechnology industry between 1981 and 2006, where the biotech firms frequently form strategic alliances to engage in innovation activities. From the empirical analyses of the patterns of these firms’ patent applications, I found that the firms’ access to structural holes does not have a direct effect, while their status has a strong, positive influence on their innovation activities. More importantly, the results show that the effect of structural holes on innovation performance is negatively moderated by the firms’ status. This study contributes to the literature by suggesting the importance of systematically considering the firms’ embeddedness in social structures, particularly the interaction between their positions in status hierarchy and structural holes.
목차
TABLE OF CONTENTSABSTRACT 11. INTRODUCTION 32. THEORY AND HYPOTHESES 72.1 Structural Holes and Innovation 72.2 Status and Innovation 92.3 Interaction between Status and Structural holes 113. METHODS 143.1 Research Setting: The U.S. Biotechnology Industry 143.2 Measures and Variables 153.3 Estimation models 184. RESULTS 205. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 23REFERENCES 27
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0