Governance becoming powerful as the best alternative to solve a local-communal problem, urban regeneration, is based on agreement-formative decision making of participants. The study for establishment of a model to measure and evaluate level of decision making of governance of urban regeneration should be preceded to make governance settle as a new alternative for establishment of urban regeneration.
This study desires to analysis the influence of governance participants of urban regeneration with examples such as Jungang-dong in Cheongju-si and Nosan-dong in Changwon-si. For this, this study deducts the major agenda of process of Urban Regeneration Project in Jungang-dong, Chengju-si(July, 2010 ~ May, 2013), and Urban Regeneration Project in Nosan-dong, Changwon-si(July, 2011 ~ August, 2013), and the influence of decision making of governance participants is divided into ideal influence and real situation, so is deducted quantitatively. Quantified data is conducted by Panel Data Analysis that Cross-sectional Data Analysis and Time Series Analysis can coincide. The results are as follows.
First, civil society-centered governance of urban regeneration is most idealistic, but market-oriented governance valuing efficiency is promoted in reality.
Second, the governance of urban regeneration in Jungang-dong of Cheongju-si is a participatory governance with an expansive diverse decision making based on interests, and develops into a civil society-centered governance. However, the governance of urban regeneration in Nosan-dong of Changwon-si is an opposing governance with the only decision-type realized by status, and develops into a market-oriented governance.
Third, in case of participants with strong interests about quantitative result to achieve fixed study purpose, the only decision-type decision making is showed by minority because of decision making by status according to getting toward finish time of urban regeneration project. This means that urban regeneration project for graded result during restricted time is difficult to develop into a governance of urban regeneration whose agreement-formative decision making is possible.
Fourth, in case of urban regeneration governance in Cheongju-si trading influence on decision making between participants, the match rate is higher by time, but in case of urban regeneration governance in Changwon-si having no effect on decision making between participants maintains regular influence continuously. This means that network formation between participants is important to make urban regeneration governance develop into a governance whose agreement-formative decision making is possible.
Fifth, the match rate of area whose continuity of urban regeneration project is tough to guess is unconverted. However, the match rate of decision making influence increases gradually by time, so this decision making changes to an expansive diverse decision making system to promote rational decision making in an area whose continuity of urban regeneration project is foreseeable. In addition, continuity or non-continuity of project influences on the match rate of participants more than characteristics between participants. This means that project continuity is important to make an urban regeneration governance develop into a governance whose agreement-formative decision making is possible.
This study is meaningful to deduct decision making influence quantitatively by governance participants and to take a new departure analyzing change factors through statistical analysis about this influence, based on evidences about urban regeneration governance of Jungang-dong in Cheongju-si and Nosan-dong in Changwon-si.
However, panel data can be built accurately by measurement on realizing time of decision making about agenda, but this study measured past decision making influence on concluded time of project, so it is apprehended that data can be corrupted. In addition, only two areas such as Jungang-dong in Cheongju-si and Nosan-dong in Changwon-si were analyzed, so generalization of the study results is difficult. The researcher hopes that the study will continue to analyze change of decision making influence by governance participants of urban regeneration in various regions and also relationship between agenda and participants based on data whose error is minimized through investigation by time when decision making about the major agenda of process of urban regeneration project in the future is conducted.