메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

허진성 (공주대학교, 공주대학교 대학원)

지도교수
양금철
발행연도
2014
저작권
공주대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수1

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this study, the purpose was present the possibility of systematic and efiicient vegetation survey through accuracy assessment from supervised classification using the aerial imagery and satellite images(GeoEye-1) of high resolution. There were appeared 4 species for conifes and 10 species for broadleaved trees in the field survey.
Aerial images and satellite images have high spatial resolution 0.5m, 0.12m respectively. Also, there were including each of the four bands(Band1, 2, 3, 4). However, the wavelength range of the band with a images of the both are different and spectral information(DNs: Digital Numbers) are also different. Therefore, classification was performed by changed the size of the training area, also analyzed affect classification accuracy by spatial and spectral resolution difference.
Band4 was the most useful band among the four bands through analyzed by tree species DNs characteristics. As a result, there were low accuracy with satellite and aerial images. The values were 34.7%, 27.8% by error matrix and 0.3, 0.23 without probability of casual coincidence(Kappa).
In the case of the multi-spectral images(Band1+2+3+4), training sample area was set (3*3), (5*5), (7*7) with satellite images, meanwhile, aerial image was set (5*5), (12*12), (17*17). As the result, overall accuracy were appeared 84.7%, 68.7%, 58.7% with satellite images, 81%, 70.2%, 64.2% with aerial images training sample numerical order, 0.84, 0.67, 0.56, 0.8, 0.68, 0.61 without probability of casual coincidence(Kappa) for only training samples. As a result of taking into account the distribution rario of the tree species from field survey, it was determined the overall accuracy assessment of randomly selected 200 pixel. These were 64% with satellite images and 57.5% with aerial images. Also overall accuracy were 0.61 with satellite images and 0.54 with aerial images in consideration of the Kappa coefficient. Therefore, in the case of overall accuracy was found to be aerial image is high. It is determined that the classification accuracy is high satellite image of accuracy assessment when considering only training area is compared to the aerial image.
It is considered that it is possible to obtain a classification result of high reliability when it is set smaller the size of the training area. Further, if the spatial resolution match between satellite image and aerial image, the result will be more objective and accurate.

목차

목 차
목 차 ⅰ
표 목차 ⅲ
그림 목차 Ⅴ
I. 서 론
1. 연구배경과 목적 1
2. 연구동향 2
Ⅱ. 원격탐사 자료처리에 대한 이론적 고찰
1. 원격탐사 원리 4
2. 영상분류 6
Ⅲ. 연구대상지 및 연구방법
1. 연구대상지 8
1) 지리적 위치 8
2) 식생현황 10
3) 사용데이터 11
2. 연구방법 14
1) 현지조사 16
2) 영상처리 17
3) 수종분류 18
Ⅳ. 결과 및 고찰
1. 현지조사결과 20
2. 수종분류결과 22
1) 영상밴드별 DNs값 분석 22
2) 다중분광영상 26
3) 분광특성의 통계적 유의성 검토 27
4) 감독분류 결과 29
3. 감독분류 정확도 검증 35
Ⅴ. 결 론
참 고 문 헌 50
ABSTRACT 52
감사의 글 54

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0