지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第173輯
- 발행연도
- 2025.3
- 수록면
- 29 - 72 (44page)
- DOI
- 10.18622/kher.2025.03.173.29
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The year 2024 marks the 130th anniversary of the outbreak of the First Sino-Japanese War, a conflict that is recognized as a significant turning point in modern East Asian history. Each country’s history textbooks describe the war differently, reflecting their respective historical perspectives and national memories. This study compares how high school history textbooks in South Korea, China, and Japan depict the First Sino-Japanese War and examines the reasons behind these differences.
China’s depiction of the war emphasizes its confrontation with foreign powers, highlighting the aggressiveness of imperialist nations and the resistance of the Chinese people. Additionally, it portrays China’s defeat as an unavoidable outcome, attributing it more to external pressure than to the failures of the Qing leadership. Furthermore, China implicitly describes the war as a turning point that led to the collapse of the traditional tributary system, positioning Korea and other neighboring countries as vassal states of the Qing dynasty.
In Japanese textbooks, the First Sino-Japanese War is presented within the context of Japan’s modernization and changes in its foreign policy, with a tendency to downplay the country’s imperialist aggression. At the same time, they emphasize the growth of national consciousness among the Japanese people and establish a connection to the Russo-Japanese War, highlighting Japan’s path to modernization and its ability to confront Western imperialist powers.
South Korean history textbooks emphasize Japan’s imperialist aggression and frame the war as a conflict between foreign powers over control of Korea. Within this perspective, the Donghak Peasant Movement is portrayed as an anti-foreign and anti-imperialist resistance. However, there is relatively little discussion of how the Korean government at the time responded to the war. The conflict between China and Japan over Korea is interpreted within the context of competition among imperialist powers, and Korea is generally presented as a victim of foreign intervention and aggression.
These differing portrayals of the First Sino-Japanese War in East Asian countries’ textbooks reflect each nation’s historical perspectives and educational objectives, with significant variations influenced by political and social contexts. This demonstrates how history education plays a crucial role in shaping collective memory and values by selectively emphasizing or omitting certain a spec ts of the past.
China’s depiction of the war emphasizes its confrontation with foreign powers, highlighting the aggressiveness of imperialist nations and the resistance of the Chinese people. Additionally, it portrays China’s defeat as an unavoidable outcome, attributing it more to external pressure than to the failures of the Qing leadership. Furthermore, China implicitly describes the war as a turning point that led to the collapse of the traditional tributary system, positioning Korea and other neighboring countries as vassal states of the Qing dynasty.
In Japanese textbooks, the First Sino-Japanese War is presented within the context of Japan’s modernization and changes in its foreign policy, with a tendency to downplay the country’s imperialist aggression. At the same time, they emphasize the growth of national consciousness among the Japanese people and establish a connection to the Russo-Japanese War, highlighting Japan’s path to modernization and its ability to confront Western imperialist powers.
South Korean history textbooks emphasize Japan’s imperialist aggression and frame the war as a conflict between foreign powers over control of Korea. Within this perspective, the Donghak Peasant Movement is portrayed as an anti-foreign and anti-imperialist resistance. However, there is relatively little discussion of how the Korean government at the time responded to the war. The conflict between China and Japan over Korea is interpreted within the context of competition among imperialist powers, and Korea is generally presented as a victim of foreign intervention and aggression.
These differing portrayals of the First Sino-Japanese War in East Asian countries’ textbooks reflect each nation’s historical perspectives and educational objectives, with significant variations influenced by political and social contexts. This demonstrates how history education plays a crucial role in shaping collective memory and values by selectively emphasizing or omitting certain a spec ts of the past.
목차
1. 序言
2. 중국: 인민의 강조와 ‘中外’의 대립 구도 부각
3. 일본: 침략성의 은폐와 ‘일본 국민’의 형성
4. 한국: 제국주의의 경쟁과 조선 정부의 대응 축소
5. 結語
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
최근 대만 역사교과서의 한국사 인식 변화 - 101과강 『선수역사(選修歷史)』와 108과강 『역사(歷史)2』 비교 분석
동북아역사논총
2021 .03
-
한국 역사교과서 현대사 서술의 문제점과 대안
역사와교육
2020 .01
-
역사교육에서 고대사 영역의 내용 체계와 계열성 검토 : 2011 교육과정과 2013 검정교과서를 중심으로
역사교육
2018 .09
-
예비 역사교사의 한국현대사 교재 집필 경험에 대한 연구
역사교육논집
2023 .02
-
교수요목기 중등 역사 검정 교과서의 발행 상황과 목록화
역사교육
2019 .09
-
제1차 교육과정기 발행 『중등국사』 (역사교육연구회 엮음) 교과서의 특성과 의의
역사교육
2018 .06
-
고등학교 『한국사』 교과서에서 고려 대외 관계사 서술의 문제점과 그 대안
역사와교육
2018 .01
-
2014년 발행 고등학교 『한국사』 교과서의 삼국시대 정치사 서술 검토
역사교육논집
2016 .01
-
『세계사』교과서 일본사 관련 서술의 현황과 전망 : 전근대사 서술을 중심으로
한일관계사연구
2017 .12
-
고등학교 세계사 교과서의 중국고중세사 서술 : 역사 용어를 중심으로
역사교육
2017 .06
-
제6차 교육과정기(1992~96) 중·고등학교 『국사』 교과서의 고려 시대 내용 분석
역사와교육
2022 .05
-
역사전쟁을 성찰하며 - 정사(正史) · 정통성(正統性)론의 함정
역사비평
2019 .08
-
2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 『한국사』 분석 - 독립운동사를 중심으로 -
역사교육
2021 .09
-
지속가능한 발전을 위한 역사교육 - 환경사와 역사교육의 연대를 위한 제언
역사비평
2022 .02
-
국정 ‘국사’ 교과서 서술 방향의 문제점과 ‘민주주의’ 교육 원칙의 왜곡
역사교육논집
2016 .01
-
중국 상하이 『역사』교과서 논쟁과 지식인 : 상하이 지역 고등학교 역사교과서의 변화
중국근현대사연구
2019 .03
-
한국 공공역사 연구의 가능성과 지향
역사비평
2024 .08
-
National History Textbooks in the Era of Global Citizenship Education: Coexistence of Global Objectives and Nationalist Narratives on the History of Ancient Korea
Korea Journal
2022 .06
-
World history가 아닌 Global history
동서인문
2021 .04
-
2009 개정교육과정과 고등 『한국사』교과서의 麗蒙交流史 서술 분석
탐라문화
2017 .02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0