지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2025.2
- 수록면
- 17 - 26 (10page)
- DOI
- 10.5143/JESK.2025.44.1.17
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objective: The purpose of this study is to systematically analyze accident cases involving agricultural tools and equipment and to propose ergonomic improvements to enhance their safety.
Background: Although the adoption rate of agricultural tools and equipment is high, their safety remains a significant concern, leading to a high frequency of accidents and substantial compensation costs.
Method: This study utilized the 'Agricultural Safety 365' database operated by the Rural Development Administration in the Republic of Korea. The search period for accident cases was set from 'before 2000 to 2019,' and the accident types and locations were set to 'all'. To systematically analyze safety accident cases related to small and medium-sized agricultural tools and equipment, the search scope was set to 'all agricultural tools' and 'transportation-related equipment.' Based on the detailed information provided by the database, the accident scenarios were reconstructed by reviewing key elements such as the accident overview, details, and extent of injuries. The accident scenarios were analyzed from multiple perspectives using the 4M approach (man, machine, media and management), identifying the causes of accidents, original cause material, and assailing materials. Considering various types of tools and equipment, the causes of accidents were categorized, and the frequency of each category was analyzed.
Results: The results of this study analyzed the primary agricultural tools and equipment involved in the 126 accident cases as ladder, brush cutter, sickle, carts, power sprayer, and saw. Among these, ladder (28%), brush cutter (25%), sickle (19%), and power sprayer (16%) accounted for approximately 83% of all accident cases. The cause of ladder-related accidents was primarily identified as occurring due to irregular ground (sloped, wet, soft, etc.) conditions in agricultural work environments. The causes of brush cutter-related accidents were primarily analyzed as unsafe behaviors and failure to follow safety work procedures due to human error, along with the lack of personal protective equipment. To ensure the safety of agricultural tools and equipment for the ultra-aged population, it is effective to prioritize improving the physical risk factors. Frequent use of machinery in agricultural work can accelerate aging and deterioration, leading to a lack of management such as regular inspections, maintenance, and repairs. Manufacturers should provide appropriate maintenance schedules and self-repair manuals, while regional agricultural organizations should engage in regular sharing of accident case studies to enable continuous monitoring.
Conclusion: To ensure the safety of agricultural work, it is essential to prioritize improvements to the physical risk associated with both the tools, equipment, and the work environment. Agricultural workers need to adopt proactive safety behaviors, such as consistently wearing personal protective equipment and engaging in regular maintenance.
Application: Based on the results of this study, it will be possible to ensure the fundamental safety of agricultural tools and equipment, contributing to the creation of a safer agricultural work environment.
Background: Although the adoption rate of agricultural tools and equipment is high, their safety remains a significant concern, leading to a high frequency of accidents and substantial compensation costs.
Method: This study utilized the 'Agricultural Safety 365' database operated by the Rural Development Administration in the Republic of Korea. The search period for accident cases was set from 'before 2000 to 2019,' and the accident types and locations were set to 'all'. To systematically analyze safety accident cases related to small and medium-sized agricultural tools and equipment, the search scope was set to 'all agricultural tools' and 'transportation-related equipment.' Based on the detailed information provided by the database, the accident scenarios were reconstructed by reviewing key elements such as the accident overview, details, and extent of injuries. The accident scenarios were analyzed from multiple perspectives using the 4M approach (man, machine, media and management), identifying the causes of accidents, original cause material, and assailing materials. Considering various types of tools and equipment, the causes of accidents were categorized, and the frequency of each category was analyzed.
Results: The results of this study analyzed the primary agricultural tools and equipment involved in the 126 accident cases as ladder, brush cutter, sickle, carts, power sprayer, and saw. Among these, ladder (28%), brush cutter (25%), sickle (19%), and power sprayer (16%) accounted for approximately 83% of all accident cases. The cause of ladder-related accidents was primarily identified as occurring due to irregular ground (sloped, wet, soft, etc.) conditions in agricultural work environments. The causes of brush cutter-related accidents were primarily analyzed as unsafe behaviors and failure to follow safety work procedures due to human error, along with the lack of personal protective equipment. To ensure the safety of agricultural tools and equipment for the ultra-aged population, it is effective to prioritize improving the physical risk factors. Frequent use of machinery in agricultural work can accelerate aging and deterioration, leading to a lack of management such as regular inspections, maintenance, and repairs. Manufacturers should provide appropriate maintenance schedules and self-repair manuals, while regional agricultural organizations should engage in regular sharing of accident case studies to enable continuous monitoring.
Conclusion: To ensure the safety of agricultural work, it is essential to prioritize improvements to the physical risk associated with both the tools, equipment, and the work environment. Agricultural workers need to adopt proactive safety behaviors, such as consistently wearing personal protective equipment and engaging in regular maintenance.
Application: Based on the results of this study, it will be possible to ensure the fundamental safety of agricultural tools and equipment, contributing to the creation of a safer agricultural work environment.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
농작업 편이·안전 장비의 안전성 관련 연구 동향 분석
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2022 .10
-
연구실 실험장비의 안전관리기준 개발에 관한 연구
대한설비관리학회지
2019 .01
-
배전급(22.9㎸) 전력기자재의 성능·환경·내구성 시험평가 인프라 구축
대한전기학회 학술대회 논문집
2020 .10
-
농업인에 적용 가능한 스마트 개인보호장비 개발 동향 분석
대한인간공학회지
2017 .12
-
건설장비의 안전 솔루션 기술 동향
드라이브·컨트롤
2023 .06
-
전기설비 자산관리를 위한 이력관리 시스템 구축에 관한 연구
조명·전기설비학회논문지
2019 .11
-
필수성능 분석을 통한 효율적인 의료기기 기능안전 접근 방안
신뢰성응용연구
2015 .03
-
인간공학적 사용자 관점에서의 농작업 및 편이장비 문헌 연구
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2024 .11
-
지역특성을 고려한 배전설비 고장률 산출에 관한 연구
전기학회논문지 P
2016 .09
-
설비유지보수문서에서의 지식 추출 방법에 대한 연구
한국CDE학회 논문집
2022 .12
-
건물 소방안전관리를 위한 IoT 기반의 실시간 모니터링 플랫폼 개발에 관한 연구
한국건축친환경설비학회 논문집
2023 .04
-
기계설비성능점검을 통한 기계설비법 제도개선 연구
대한설비공학회 학술발표대회논문집
2023 .11
-
YOLO 기반의 실시간 안전장비 착용 및 이상행동 감지 시스템
대한전자공학회 학술대회
2021 .11
-
스마트 설비관리시스템 구축 및 효과분석
반도체디스플레이기술학회지
2017 .01
-
개인 안전 장비 착용 확인 시스템 개발
Proceedings of KIIT Conference
2022 .06
-
뿌리산업 설비보전 체계분석 및 기반연구
한국생산제조학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2016 .04
-
제조국가별 국가연구시설장비 구축 현황에 따른 국산연구장비 산업 활성화 정책 제언: 기초·분석과학 분야 중심으로
한국산학기술학회 논문지
2019 .05
-
생애이력 기반 특고압 전기설비 안전관리 서비스를 위한 시스템 기술 개발
전기학회논문지
2022 .12
-
조직의 안전행동에 따른 연구원의 안전의식 수준 및 안전문화 향상정도에 관한 연구
한국안전학회지
2015 .01
-
건설현장 안전을 위한 로봇 기반 안전장비 식별 시스템
제어로봇시스템학회 국내학술대회 논문집
2023 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092454940