메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Shim Hyeong Kyun (Department of Neurosurgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea) Lee Byung-Jou (Department of Neurosurgery, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital) Lee Chae Heuck (epartment of Neurosurgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea) Sohn Moon Jun (Department of Neurosurgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea) Shim Sook Young (Department of Neurosurgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea) Choi Chan Young (Department of Neurosurgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea) Han Sung Rok (Department of Neurosurgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea) Kim Kwang Hyeon (Department of Neurosurgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea) Koo Hae Won (Department of Neurosurgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea)
저널정보
대한뇌혈관외과학회 Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery Vol.26 No.2
발행연도
2024.7
수록면
141 - 151 (11page)
DOI
10.7461/jcen.2023.E2023.08.002

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objective: Double microcatheter technique (dMC) can be the alternative to Single microcatheter technique (sMC) for challenging cases, but there is lack of studies comparing dMC to sMC especifically for small ruptured aneurysms. Our objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of dMC to sMC in treating small (≤5 mm) and tiny (≤3 mm) ruptured aneurysms.Methods: This study focused on 91 out of 280 patients who had ruptured aneurysms and underwent either single or double microcatheter coil embolization. These patients were treated with either single or double microcatheter coil embolization. We divided the patients into two groups based on the procedural method and evaluated clinical features and outcomes. Subgroup analyses were conducted specifically for tiny aneurysms, comparing the two methods, and within the dMC group, we also examined whether the aneurysm was tiny or not. In addition, univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of coil packing density.Results: The mean values for most outcome measures in the dMC group were higher than those in the sMC group, but these differences did not reach statistical significance (coil packing density, 45.739% vs. 39.943%; procedural complication, 4.17% vs. 11.94%; recanalization, 8.3% vs. 10.45%; discharge discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS), 1.83 vs. 1.97). The comparison between tiny aneurysms and other sizes within the dMC group did not reveal any significant differences in terms of worse outcomes or increased risk. The only factor that significantly influenced coil packing density in the univariate logistic regression analysis was the size of the aneurysm (OR 0.309, 95% CI 0.169–0.566, p=0.000).Conclusions: The dMC proved to be a safe and viable alternative to the sMC for treating small ruptured aneurysms in challenging cases.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0