지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The ‘experiential meaning’ in Korean, Chinese, and Japanese is realized through different grammatical means. The constructions ‘-ㄴ 적(이) 있-’ in Korean and ‘-たことがある’ in Japanese share the commonality of being a periphrastic construction involving an existential verb. Meanwhile, the Korean construction ‘-었었-’ has been grammaticalized as a tense marker but originated from a meaning of ‘existence’ and developed to express ‘experiential meaning’. In contrast, the Chinese marker ‘过2’ has evolved from a meaning related to ‘movement’ to express ‘completion’ and ‘experiential meaning’. This study posits that the varying degrees of grammaticalization and specificity within each language are significant factors contributing to differences in temporal adverbs and verb usage.
Additionally, this paper re-examines existing scholarly views on the conditions for the realization of ‘experiential meaning’. The essential conditions include ‘indefiniteness-unspecificity’ and ‘discontinuity’, while ‘repeatability’ is generally considered, except in cases involving widely accepted historical facts, where it may not apply as strictly.
Korean, Chinese, and Japanese languages generally exhibit a hierarchy in the constraint on temporal adverbs, following the order ‘Japanese ＞ Korean ＞ Chinese’, with respect to whether the past event is distant or recent. However, this hierarchy does not always apply, particularly in cases of ‘socially conventionalized cognitive mechanisms’ or ‘events that are socially considered rare’. Specifically, in the case of rare events, Korean and Chinese show a variety of co-occurrences with temporal adverbs, while Japanese consistently aligns with non-specific past adverbs. This suggests that the experiential markers in Korean and Chinese may sometimes ignore the remoteness of the experience, while the Japanese marker ‘-たことがある’ remains restricted by its existential construction, continuing to enforce constraints related to temporal adverbs.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중ㆍ한ㆍ일 정도부사 ‘更’, ‘더’, ‘もっと’의 대조분석 ― ‘트랜스-동아시아’ 언어 연구의 일례
중국학논총
2024 .09
-
‘트랜스-동아시아’ 연구 동향 및 전망 ― 디지털 인문학적 방법론에 입각하여
중국학논총
2024 .09
-
한·중·일 ‘自己’ 관련 어휘 비교 연구 ― 트랜스-동아시아 언어 연구의 일례
중국학논총
2022 .06
-
2009개정 3∼4학년군 과학교육과정과 연계한 체험학습 장소 및 과제형 체험학습 프로그램 개발
초등과학교육
2017 .08
-
중국어 부사어와 보어의 어순대비 분석 - 한·중 상호 번역과 교학을 중심으로 -
동북아 문화연구
2021 .03
-
A Comparative Study of East Asian Students’ Short and Long-Term Writing Development
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2019 .10
-
Development of Digital Trade and East Asian Cooperation
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2023 .07
-
低程度で肯定的な可能性･蓋然性をあらわす副詞「ワンチャン」の発生
일본언어문화
2022 .06
-
THE CONFUCIAN VIEW : PUTTING EAST ASIAN EDUCATION IN CONTEXT
Global Asia
2015 .06
-
동아시아 공공성은 가능한가? - 새로운 동아시아지역주의의 사상적 기반
아시아연구
2022 .05
-
Perceptions of Sino-U.S relations and the East Asian regional order among Chinese intellectuals
중소연구
2017 .08
-
A Comparative Study of East Asian vs Non-East Asian Students’ Linguistic Development
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2020 .07
-
A Comparative Analysis of word order in Chinese Adverb and Complement
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2019 .07
-
On The Development Strategy Features and Trends of East Asian Foreign Language Education Policy
평화학연구
2015 .12
-
The East Asian Peace : How Did It Happen? How Deep Is It?
Global Asia
2015 .12
-
동아시아 공동체에 있어 해역 공간의 재인식
아세아연구
2017 .12
-
『동북아문화연구』 투고논문 현황 분석
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2017 .07
-
古代漢語 副詞의 범주 재 고찰
중국연구
2017 .01
-
A Study on East Asian Supply Chain Restructuring and Regional Cooperation under the Adjustment of Economic Globalization
한국동북아논총
2021 .06
-
동아시아담론에 대한 비평적 회고와 전망 : ‘의지적 낙관주의’와 ‘미래사적 방법론’의 활용
아세아연구
2018 .12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0