지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국국방연구원 The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis Vol.36 No.3
- 발행연도
- 2024.9
- 수록면
- 369 - 388 (20page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article examines the People’s Republic of China (PRC)’s response to the U.S. Indo–Pacific Strategy through the application of the Senturion predictive political simulation model, which is grounded in game theory. Its objective is to demystify the intricate decision-making processes within the PRC and forecast its actions in the Indo–Pacific sphere. The Senturion model, tailored to tackle the escalating complexities of national security concerns, facilitates the identification of potential threats and the comprehension of geopolitical occurrences. Employing agent-based modeling and incorporating insights from political science theories, the model is instrumental in mitigating risks by scrutinizing political dynamics and pinpointing key stakeholders. Merging principles from game theory, AI and behavioral economics, Senturion enhances strategic decision-making by evaluating a range of scenarios and analyzing the capabilities and interests of stakeholders. This methodology provides invaluable perspectives and strategic options for Indo– Pacific policymakers and analysts, aiming to guide them through the intricacies of regional dynamics effectively.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Intellectual Property as National Security: The Case of AI in the Indo-Pacific
Global Asia
2022 .12
-
Korea’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and its Implications for Bilateral Cooperation between India and South Korea
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2023 .07
-
The Taiwan Strait and the ROK–U.S. Alliance
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2023 .03
-
Korea’s ‘Economy-Security Strategy’ and the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework
IFANS FOCUS
2022 .08
-
The Indo-Pacific Strategy and Japanese Diplomacy
IFANS FOCUS
2018 .01
-
미중 데탕트와 유엔군사령부 해체 결정에 관한 연구, 1971-1973
한국군사학논집
2022 .06
-
Canada’s Indo-Pacific Future: Time for a Long-Term Strategy
Global Asia
2022 .06
-
Japan’s Changing Vision of a Free and Open Indo-Pacific
Global Asia
2019 .03
-
Indonesia Must Lead in the Indo-Pacific Region
Global Asia
2018 .09
-
진보적 교육학 도서에 대한 분석
사회과학연구
2016 .12
-
Helping the US Lead Again: Japan’s Vision of a Free and Open Indo-Pacific
Global Asia
2021 .03
-
Comparison of U.S., Japan and EU’s Indo-Pacific Strategies, with a Focus on Development Cooperation
IFANS PERSPECTIVES
2022 .03
-
India's Indo‐Pacific Strategy: A Pragmatic Balancing between the United States and China
Pacific Focus
2021 .01
-
The US Indo-Pacific Strategy and Geoeconomics
IFANS FOCUS
2018 .04
-
Asia-Pacific vs. Indo-Pacific: Paradigm Shift or False Choice?
Global Asia
2023 .09
-
Introduction Middle-Power Agency in an Indo-Pacific Era
Global Asia
2023 .09
-
미-중 경쟁 격화와 유럽의 선택
사회과학연구
2021 .08
-
US-Japan-India: Risks and Rewards In the Indo-Pacific
Global Asia
2020 .03
-
The ROK’s Indo-Pacific Strategy under President Yoon: Key Elements and Strategic Implications
IFANS FOCUS
2022 .12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0