메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
윤순석 (전남대학교) 김효진 (전주대학교) Charles R. Pryor (Western Illinois University)
저널정보
한국세무회계학회 세무회계연구 세무회계연구 제81호
발행연도
2024.9
수록면
17 - 48 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
[Purpose] We examine whether the Korea Audit Reform Amendment (KARA) of 2017 improves audit quality for all listed firms. Instead of investigating the effect of individual KARA elements that take effect sequentially, we treat all KARA elements as a package and investigate their effect from the KARA’s first year of 2019. [Methodology] We use all KOSPI listed firms as our sample subject to data availability since KARA affects all listed firms. We use discretionary accruals as a measure of audit quality. For the estimation of discretionary accruals, we use two accrual models (Modified Jones model and a new model) using two alternative estimation approaches to enhance the robustness of audit quality measures. We employ both univariate between-period difference tests and multivariate regression analyses. We test both mean and variance differences between periods for the univariate tests. Also, we use a new metric called ‘excess discretionary accruals (EDA)’ as a modified version of the difference-in-differences test. We use a dummy variable, KARA, as the main variable of interest for the multivariate regression methods. [Findings] We document that KARA significantly improves audit quality. Discretionary accrual levels and variances in the post-KARA period (2019-2020) have been significantly lower than in the pre-KARA period (2011-2018). These findings are robust to differences in financial performance, leverage ratios, auditor reputation, and discretionary accrual models and estimation approaches. [implications] Our research has strong theoretical and policy implications. We contribute to the literature by using a new accrual model and a modified version of the difference-in- differences method when a new regulation affects all firms. Finally, our finding that KARA improves audit quality provides positive policy implications to the government’s regulatory policy amidst companies’ opposition to the regulation because the regulation comes with high compliance costs.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0