지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第169輯
- 발행연도
- 2024.12
- 수록면
- 217 - 250 (34page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2024.12.169.217
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study aimed to seek the place names of the areas that were transcribed as islands located in the Indian Ocean at the 『Gangrido』 and understand the arrangement context. To serch for the place names, this study investigated Chinese historical materials and travel records of diverse cultural zones and intended to interpret them according to the capital names of corresponding areas. As a result, it seemed that Nobal(奴發) and Seohyol(西穴) were originated from the names of the Nabhanis and the Scier of South Arabia. It was assumed that Ari(阿里) was from the transliteration of Ali and in particular, it was from the Sanaa under the influence of the Shia Ismaili among Yemen powers. Accordingly, Marongsa(麻龍沙), Noam(奴啱), Mahaphapsuk(馬合哈叔) and Happala(合八牙) as the names of the islands could be interpreted as Malindi, Nubia, Cairo and Alexandria. Cairo was as the capital of the Fatimids who belonged to the Shia Ismaili Family, controlled the business networks connected to the Mediterranean Sea through the Red Sea from the 10th century to the 12th century. Therefore, it was assumed that the places named islands were parts of the continent and arrangement of the pieces, the South India, the southern end of the Arabian Peninsula, the east coast of Kenya, Cairo and Alexandria of the Africa was understood as the merchant networks that actively worked at the Colas and the Fatimids.
For one thing, the part of the continent was named as islands as geographical knowledge was accumulated through sailing. The cases that inland and peninsula were misunderstood as islands were shown both in Islamic and Chinese data in the 12th and 13th centuries. In comparison with the world map of Idrisi, the Gangrido presented more specific and exact and newer information on South India and Bengal Sea. The characteristic was inherited to the 『Zenghe Chart(鄭和航海圖)』. It indicates that the two charts were from the same family. For acknowledging the existence of the Indian Sea Chart before the 『Zenghe Chart』, the trace could be found in the pieces of continent in the 『Ganglido』. The other focus was given on the fact that the continent pieces were influenced by Monsoon season. It was assumed that the geographical concept in respect Monsoon season was inherited from geographical recognition of Persian people in considering of etymology of ‘land above wind’ and ‘land below wind’. Accordingly, it is considered that geographical information on maritime affairs was originated from geographical recognition of Persia and that the pieces of continent were based on that Monsoon what was the most important factor to make the world of the Indian Ocean organized as trade network. At that time, South India, Arab and East African Coast worked as an important bridge to connect and a gate to the world. That is, it is concluded that the pieces of continent in respect to maritime affairs reflected trade networks formed as sailing routines and independent sailing navigation of merchants who worked at the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean.
For one thing, the part of the continent was named as islands as geographical knowledge was accumulated through sailing. The cases that inland and peninsula were misunderstood as islands were shown both in Islamic and Chinese data in the 12th and 13th centuries. In comparison with the world map of Idrisi, the Gangrido presented more specific and exact and newer information on South India and Bengal Sea. The characteristic was inherited to the 『Zenghe Chart(鄭和航海圖)』. It indicates that the two charts were from the same family. For acknowledging the existence of the Indian Sea Chart before the 『Zenghe Chart』, the trace could be found in the pieces of continent in the 『Ganglido』. The other focus was given on the fact that the continent pieces were influenced by Monsoon season. It was assumed that the geographical concept in respect Monsoon season was inherited from geographical recognition of Persian people in considering of etymology of ‘land above wind’ and ‘land below wind’. Accordingly, it is considered that geographical information on maritime affairs was originated from geographical recognition of Persia and that the pieces of continent were based on that Monsoon what was the most important factor to make the world of the Indian Ocean organized as trade network. At that time, South India, Arab and East African Coast worked as an important bridge to connect and a gate to the world. That is, it is concluded that the pieces of continent in respect to maritime affairs reflected trade networks formed as sailing routines and independent sailing navigation of merchants who worked at the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 奴發, 西穴, 阿里의 지명 비정
Ⅲ. 麻龍沙, 奴啱, 馬合哈叔, 合八牙의 지명 비정
Ⅳ. 대륙 조각들의 배치와 조기 항해도의 존재
Ⅴ. 항해 패턴과 ‘바람 아래의 대륙’
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
현대중국어 평가양상 범주 및 조동사 고찰
중국언어연구
2020 .01
-
??原理?《??》疑??句??
중국학
2020 .01
-
임진전쟁 발발로 인한 明代 海防認識의 변화 : 『籌海圖編』과 『籌海重編』 속 海防地圖를 중심으로
역사와경계
2024 .08
-
명대 가정년간 해상세력의 형성과 분화 - 『일본일감』을 중심으로 -
역사와경계
2019 .12
-
해상실크로드, 線인가 面인가? - 李慶新,『海上絲綢之路』, 黃山書社, 2016, 296면.
인문사회과학연구
2018 .01
-
경제안보정책이 한국 반도체 산업 무역에 끼치는 영향 - 한국, 미국, 중국, 일본을 중심으로 -
일본문화연구
2024 .10
-
동아시아 고해도(古海圖) 연구현황과 과제
인문사회과학연구
2024 .08
-
14∼18세기 중국-조선의 민간무역과 商人
민족문화연구
2015 .01
-
독도관련 평화선 해도의 국제지도증거법상 의미 연구
일본문화학보
2022 .05
-
韓國漢文學에서의 ‘修辭立其誠’ 논의와 그 修辭學的 맥락
수사학
2020 .09
-
동서문화교섭의 이해 – 스키타이·흉노와 한국 고대문화
유라시아문화
2023 .02
-
『古今圖書集成』 理學彙編 經籍典 易經部에 대한 시론적 고찰
온지논총
2021 .01
-
개항과 전통시장 : 1880년대 이전 중국의 설탕시장
중국근현대사연구
2017 .12
-
[나비야 청산가자 25회] 주周역易은 외지 마라
월간에세이
2024 .03
-
數字經濟、文化距離與國際文化貿易的關系?究: 基於2007-2018年中國對RCEP十國的核心文化?品出口面板數據
중국지식네트워크
2021 .11
-
역지사지에 대한 선진유가ㆍ도가의 철학실천 방법론 연구
순천향 인문과학논총
2018 .03
-
주희의 ‘부동심(不動心)’ 개념 해석과 문제들
한국철학논집
2024 .05
-
기정진 경학(經學)의 특징적 양상에 관한 검토 - 경전에 대한 인식과 공부를 중심으로 -
동방학
2022 .08
-
明末淸初 錢澄之 詩學의 “氣”論 硏究
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2024 .11
-
『大觀茶論』 ‘序’에 나타난 徽宗의 茶文化觀
차문화산업학
2024 .09
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092145731