메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
나상수 (서울대학교)
저널정보
한국문법교육학회 문법교육 문법 교육 제50권
발행연도
2024.4
수록면
41 - 88 (48page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In order to explore the specific aspects of ‘grammar inquiry’, which has not been able to derive a single consensus concept, this paper established the 2015 revised Korean textbook corpus and conducted word embedding for the textbook corpus through the Word2Vec model. Then, we tried to examine how ‘grammar inquiry’ is represented, by interpreting the implications of 43 key thinking vocabulary in grammar inquiry through cluster analysis. As a result, this paper formed six clusters for 43 key thinking vocabulary. Through each cluster, it was discovered that ‘recognizing’, ‘excluding’, ‘separating’, ‘permitting’, and ‘connecting’ are key thinking vocabulary that mainly appears in grammar inquiry for a phonological unit. Furthermore, it was confirmed that thinking activities such as ‘including’, ‘limiting’, ‘classifying’, and ‘connecting’ appeared in grammar inquiry for a word unit, and ‘regulating’, ‘applying’, ‘presenting’, ‘referring’, ‘confirming’ and ‘accepting’ are used as major thinking activities in a prescriptive grammar area. In addition, although they did not form a clear cluster, it was found that ‘omitting’, ‘connecting’, ‘speculating’, ‘connecting’, and ‘distinguishing’ are the main thinking activities required in grammar inquiry for a sentence unit, while ‘constructing’, ‘deciding’, and ‘interpreting’ are required in grammar inquiry for a discourse unit.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0