메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강은희 (서울대학교) 박신영 (서울대학교)
저널정보
대한치과의사협회 대한치과의사협회지 대한치과의사협회지 Vol.62 No.9(Wn.664)
발행연도
2024.9
수록면
555 - 564 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objectives: This study aims to investigate dental students’ perceptions regarding the evaluation of clinical practice and to explore the factors influencing these perception.
Methods: An online survey was conducted targeting third and fourth-year dental students from 11 nationwide dental schools. The survey focused on their perceptions of the accuracy and faimess of two clinical practices: 1) clinical clerkship in specialy clinics, and 2) direct patient care in pre-doctoral treatment centers. Additionally, the effects of different clerkship models (disciplinary block, longitudinal integrated), evaluation units (individual subject, integrated subject), and grading systems (grading, pass/fail) were assessed.
Results: The overall perception of fairness and accuracy in clinical practice evaluation was found to be low. Students in disciplinary block clinical practice settings reported lower perceptions of evaluation accuracy and fairness compared to those in longitudinal integrated or mixed schedule types. Furthermore, the grading system influenced the perception of fairness and accuracy in the evaluation of clinical practices. Regarding direnct patient care in pre-doctoral treatment centers, the evaluation units significantly impacted students’ perceptions, although the grading system did not. Groups with grading systems showed lower perceptions compared to those with pass/fail or mixed evaluation systems.
Conclusion: The study reveals that dental students perceive clinical practice evaluations as generally unfair and inaccurate, particularly within disciplinary block schedules. To improve future dental education, adopting longitudinal integrated schedules could be considered to enhance the perceived fairness and accuracy of clinical practice evaluations.

목차

ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과
Ⅳ. 논의 및 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0