메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Daniel Plesniak (Seoul National University)
저널정보
사단법인 한국언어학회 언어학 언어학 제99호
발행연도
2024.8
수록면
77 - 116 (40page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A persistent challenge for c-command-based accounts of bound variable anaphora has been that elements within nominals sometimes seem to “bind out” of them, as in the case of “possessor binding” (a.k.a. “spec-binding”). While these phenomena are much discussed in the literature, certain details about them have rarely been noted, most crucially that the acceptability of bound variable readings in such cases are subject to a great deal of variation, which is conditioned on the individual in question, the particular lexical items involved, and more. Recent work suggests that this variation is not random, but implicates the effects of multiple distinct “sources” of interpretation, ranging in nature from structural to linear precedence-based to semantic/pragmatic, each of which has its own clearly detectable signature. In this paper, using the judgements of myself and two other researchers, the effects of these sources are teased apart and the implications thereof considered. The results show c-command does indeed play a role, but as one of many factors that determine bound variable reading acceptability. Crucially, binding out is unavailable when binding is based purely on c-command, but is available when based on other sources.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Hypotheses about structure and BVA
3. Procedure and predictions
4. Investigation and results
5. Conclusion
References
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-090657288