메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박선미 (서울기독대학교) 정은영 (서울기독대학교)
저널정보
한국화장품미용학회 한국화장품미용학회지 한국화장품미용학회지 제14권 1호
발행연도
2024.6
수록면
89 - 97 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As if representing the current era of hyper-individualization, many people are learning their individual body type characteristics through skeletal diagnosis and creating their own individuality and trends through perfect presentation. Skeletal diagnosis makes physical characteristics look attractive by complementing the shortcomings of the body type and strengthening the strengths according to the skeletal type. However, the current skeletal type analysis involves a lot of sensory evaluation based on the diagnostician"s subjective criteria, resulting in differences in analysis. This study seeks to present an objective analysis method by quantifying subjective evaluation factors according to the diagnostician"s capabilities when analyzing skeletal type. For this purpose, measurements from the 8th Korean Anthropometric Survey provided by Size Korea were used to classify women by age and quantify diagnostic factors according to body parts for three types of skeletal diagnosis: straight, wavy, and natural. As a result of the study, the subjective terms of the diagnostic elements for the analysis of skeletal diagnosis types were thick, thin, moderate, short and thick, long and thin, moderate shoulder line, sagging shoulder line, shoulder line. The diagnostic factors analyzed as straight, kneecap not protruding, kneecap protruding moderately, kneecap protruding a lot, small, and large were quantified, and the measurement location was also clearly indicated. As a result, it is expected to be used as basic data for analysis by type of skeletal diagnosis by increasing objectivity and reliability in skeletal diagnosis analysis and enabling clear skeletal diagnosis analysis.

목차

ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구내용
Ⅵ. 결과
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-090287633