지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.5
- 수록면
- 257 - 286 (30page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2024.5.35.2.257
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Administrative monopoly is an economic phenomenon with distinct Chinese characteristics that emerged during the transformation and development period of China"s socialist market economy. In 1993, the "People"s Republic of China Anti-Unfair Competition Law" (hereinafter referred to as the "Anti-Unfair Competition Law") was enacted, raising issues of market competition restriction by administrative power to a legal level for the first time. By introducing relevant provisions and using the term "abuse of administrative power," the concept of "administrative monopoly" was officially recognized. In 2008, China promulgated the "People"s Republic of China Anti-Monopoly Law" (hereinafter referred to as the "Anti-Monopoly Law"), which echoed expressions from the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, pointing out that organizations with delegated public administrative functions should not abuse administrative power to exclude or restrict competition. The latest revised version of the Anti-Monopoly Law in 2022 maintains provisions related to administrative monopoly while adding some content.
This paper aims to address the issue of unclear definition of this concept in academia by analyzing and summarizing cases published by the State Administration for Market Regulation of China. Additionally, it empirically analyzes the conditions, subjects, and outcomes of administrative monopoly. Furthermore, it provides additional analysis of the characteristics and issues of regulating administrative monopoly under the 2022 revision of China"s Anti-Monopoly Law. The characteristics of the revised Anti-Monopoly Law include unified enforcement authorities and expanded regulatory scope, while the issues include insufficient penalties for illegal administrative entities and inadequate regulation of illegal abstract administrative actions. These are aspects that China should pay attention to and improve in future legal revisions.
When considering laws such as the Anti-Monopoly Law that regulate administrative monopoly in China, it is necessary for Korean companies operating in China to utilize them to the fullest extent. Korean companies operating in China can use the Anti-Monopoly Law as a basis to prevent or remove constraints on unreasonable business activities by arguing that various competition-restricting measures by local governments constitute abuses of administrative power. Additionally, governmental intervention in economic markets through preferential treatment for specific industries or companies, inappropriate cooperation between sectors, and market price interventions can be monitored, focusing on hidden administrative monopoly practices (illegal administrative guidance). This role is principally thought to be carried out by the Fair Trade Commission. In some cases, the Audit Office or the Human Rights Commission could also play a role. Regulating government administrative monopoly practices can help maximize the freedom of the capital market and facilitate the expansion of cooperation and trade between private enterprises in both Korea and China.
This paper aims to address the issue of unclear definition of this concept in academia by analyzing and summarizing cases published by the State Administration for Market Regulation of China. Additionally, it empirically analyzes the conditions, subjects, and outcomes of administrative monopoly. Furthermore, it provides additional analysis of the characteristics and issues of regulating administrative monopoly under the 2022 revision of China"s Anti-Monopoly Law. The characteristics of the revised Anti-Monopoly Law include unified enforcement authorities and expanded regulatory scope, while the issues include insufficient penalties for illegal administrative entities and inadequate regulation of illegal abstract administrative actions. These are aspects that China should pay attention to and improve in future legal revisions.
When considering laws such as the Anti-Monopoly Law that regulate administrative monopoly in China, it is necessary for Korean companies operating in China to utilize them to the fullest extent. Korean companies operating in China can use the Anti-Monopoly Law as a basis to prevent or remove constraints on unreasonable business activities by arguing that various competition-restricting measures by local governments constitute abuses of administrative power. Additionally, governmental intervention in economic markets through preferential treatment for specific industries or companies, inappropriate cooperation between sectors, and market price interventions can be monitored, focusing on hidden administrative monopoly practices (illegal administrative guidance). This role is principally thought to be carried out by the Fair Trade Commission. In some cases, the Audit Office or the Human Rights Commission could also play a role. Regulating government administrative monopoly practices can help maximize the freedom of the capital market and facilitate the expansion of cooperation and trade between private enterprises in both Korea and China.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 행정독점의 행위요건, 주체요건, 결과요건
Ⅲ. 최근의 전형적인 행정독점 사례
Ⅳ. 현행 반독점법상 행정독점 규제
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국 반독점법 2022년 개정법의 실체법적 개정사항
법학연구
2023 .06
-
중국 정부조달 중 행정적 독점에 관한 법적 검토
명지법학
2024 .07
-
중국의 반독점법의 적용과 시사점
무역연구
2015 .01
-
互联网平台反垄断合规研究 -- 基于中国反垄断局行政处罚案件分析 --
동북아법연구
2022 .04
-
China’s Stronger Enforcement of the Anti-Monopoly Law and Korea’s Response
[KDI] KDI FOCUS
2016 .06
-
행정기본법 제정안의 평가와 주요쟁점 검토
공법학연구
2020 .11
-
행정법상 처분 개념 - 성문 개념 규정과 대법원 판례에 대한 비판 -
공법연구
2024 .12
-
행정제재에 관한 법제 개선 방안 - 벌칙 중심 규제의 개혁을 위한 시론 -
홍익법학
2022 .12
-
독일의 ‘신사조 행정법학’과 한국의 행정법학
법학연구
2021 .09
-
행정절차법의 기능변화와 법적쟁점에 관한 연구
공법연구
2021 .02
-
松潤 姜求哲 敎授 행정법학의 성과와 경향적 특성
법학논총
2022 .02
-
中国2014年《行政诉讼法》修正案的主要内容及未来发展
동북아법연구
2015 .01
-
2021년 행정법(I) 중요판례평석
인권과 정의
2022 .03
-
산업안전보건법상의 행정명령과 도급규제의 문제점에 대한 고찰
노동법포럼
2019 .11
-
지방행정에서의 정책법무에 관한 공법적 연구 ― 일본에서의 신 지방 행정법학의 등장과 발전과정을 중심으로 ―
공법연구
2021 .06
-
2019년 행정법(I) 중요판례평석
인권과 정의
2020 .01
-
2018년 행정법(I) 중요판례평석
인권과 정의
2019 .01
-
사회주의 시장경제를 추구하는 중국 반독점법상 행정독점 규제
중국법연구
2020 .01
-
2017년 행정법(I) 중요 판례
인권과 정의
2018 .01
-
행정형벌의 행정질서벌화 경향에 대한 소고 - 행정형벌의 비범죄화·비형벌화를 중심으로 -
한국범죄심리연구
2015 .01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0