메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Chihyun Ryu (Korea University) Bosub Kim (Korea University)
저널정보
한국디자인학회 Archives of Design Research Archives of Design Research Vol.37 No.2 (Wn.150)
발행연도
2024.5
수록면
59 - 76 (18page)
DOI
10.15187/adr.2024.05.37.2.59

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: Despite the social nature of collaborative design, the collaborative design process has not been sufficiently researched as a social action. Intersubjectivity, which concerns the relations between various perspectives of two or more people, can serve as a useful framework for understanding the complex process of collaborative design and proposing effective communication methods to achieve the common goal of designers.
Methods: This study aims to analyse the process of achieving mutual understanding and a common ground during a collaborative design process, utilising the concept of intersubjectivity. The earlier meetings for the ideation of two teams of three designers each were observed, and the conversations were analysed. The analysis mainly focused on their levels of perspective and meaning generation.
Results: A matrix was developed based on the levels of the two variables, and each conversation was categorised according to the evaluation of these variables. To summarise, four key categories emerged: 1.1 Exchange of Expressions, 1.3 Interpretation of Shared Experiences, 3.1 Confirmation, and 3.3 Negotiation . When a conversation exhibited a lower level of meaning-making and a higher level of diverse perspectives, participants typically confirmed the established common ground. In contrast, when there was a high level of meaning-making and complex interactions among perspectives, participants either resolved their misunderstandings about the newly created meaning or remained in a state of misunderstanding without realising it.
Conclusions: This analysis leads to the conclusion that the complex and critical conversations, which significantly impacted on the outcome, were a result of the cumulative effects of ‘simpler’ conversations that scored low on both variables. Throughout the meeting process, the regeneration of meaning and establishment of common ground were achieved.

목차

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Method
4. Result
5. Discussion
6. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089744627