지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.2
- 수록면
- 61 - 83 (23page)
- DOI
- 10.15187/adr.2024.02.37.1.61
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background : To understand the visual discrepancy during design critique and consultation, we evaluate the Associative Words Generator<SUP>©</SUP> (AWG<SUP>©</SUP>) application to visualize three-dimensional spaces and objects based on spoken words (verbalizations).
Methods : The study encompassed a total of 36 respondents, with each group—students (S), studio lecturers (L), clients (C), and designers/architects (D/A)—comprising nine respondents. Equipped with a virtual reality VR device linked to the AWG<SUP>©</SUP> application, each respondent assessed the outcomes of the 3D room visualization generated by AWG<SUP>©</SUP>. We gauged the depth of associative words and established a semantic model to describe the perceived environment, employing a seven-point Likert questionnaire based on Semantisk Miljobeskrivning (SMB) environmental quality dimensions.
Results : The findings demonstrate that the student and studio lecturer groups exhibit a similar inclination towards evaluating the pleasantness–affection dimension, while the client and designer/architect groups demonstrate a shared tendency to rate the pleasantness–complexity dimension.
Conclusions : Notably, AWG<SUP>©</SUP> proved effective in reducing the visual discrepancy gap among student and lecturer groups, as well as client and designer groups during design critique.
Methods : The study encompassed a total of 36 respondents, with each group—students (S), studio lecturers (L), clients (C), and designers/architects (D/A)—comprising nine respondents. Equipped with a virtual reality VR device linked to the AWG<SUP>©</SUP> application, each respondent assessed the outcomes of the 3D room visualization generated by AWG<SUP>©</SUP>. We gauged the depth of associative words and established a semantic model to describe the perceived environment, employing a seven-point Likert questionnaire based on Semantisk Miljobeskrivning (SMB) environmental quality dimensions.
Results : The findings demonstrate that the student and studio lecturer groups exhibit a similar inclination towards evaluating the pleasantness–affection dimension, while the client and designer/architect groups demonstrate a shared tendency to rate the pleasantness–complexity dimension.
Conclusions : Notably, AWG<SUP>©</SUP> proved effective in reducing the visual discrepancy gap among student and lecturer groups, as well as client and designer groups during design critique.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Related work
3. Methodology
4. Results and discussion
5. Conclusions
6. Future work
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089393504