메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Lu, Yunhang (Soochow University) Chen, Xi (Taiyuan University of Technology)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제32권 제6호 (자연과학 편)
발행연도
2023.12
수록면
661 - 670 (10page)
DOI
10.35159/kjss.2023.12.32.6.661

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study was aimed at examining whether the effectiveness of self-talk is consistent across different moving conditions and shooting distances. The subjects that involved 13 male basketball players specialising in physical education in the college were recruited for this experiment. In this study, we adopted Wulf et al."s (2005) Shooting Performance Rating Scale to calculate shooting accuracy. The scale assigned points according to where the basketball lands after shooting, using a five-point scoring system. The result found that in free throw, the score in self-talk group was 44.25 compared to the score of 40.73 in the non self-talk task (P<.001). In spot shooting of two-point task, the score in the self-talk group was 41.60 (3.96), whilst it was 38.13 in the non self-talk task (P<.001); for three-point task, the score was 36.69 in the self-talk group whereas it was 33.92 (P=.005) in the non self-talk group. In moving shooting of two-point task, the score in self-talk group was 37.26, whilst it was 37.88 in the non self-talk task (P=.446); for three-point task, the score was 33.51 in the self-talk group, whereas it was 33.46 (P=.952) in the non self talk group. It revealed that self-talk"s effect on basketball shooting performance was predominantly contingent on whether the task was single or dual-task oriented as opposed to directly correlated to distance. Furthermore, self-talk had a positive effect on the shooting of a single motor task, whilst it did not improve the accuracy of the shooting integrated with a movement of manoeuvring the ball.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Method
Ⅲ. Results
Ⅳ. Discussion
Ⅴ. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089240900