지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.12
- 수록면
- 755 - 773 (19page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Jung Yak-yong criticized that Choseon Dynasty`s Principle of Sentencing Guideline were imbued with doctrines of Chu His, and suggested a new approach, theory of Shimkwon, the mind could be subjects of moral or immoral acts. His sentencing argument as the principle of the guilty party(Schuldprinzip) was based on the loyalty and love of people. Thus, in this respect, he suggested reasons of mitigating that were misadventure, misfortune, disease, poverty, and mistake of crime-constituting condition. Revenge on the enemy of parents or grand parents was included in that reasons. But, Jung could not classify the misadventure and the mistake.There is an argument that he had less to emphasize law as compared with Ogyu Sorai of Tokukawa Japan. However, I think that this is derived from misunderstanding of concept of the rule of law. The rule of Li(禮) is an obvious parallel to the rule of law in the formal perspective. According to natural law theory, law must be related with morality. He argued his theory on the natural law theory. Also, Jung asserted that the law is not a means to utilitarian end, but pursuing moral values. In his respect, people were a essential element of nation as moral community. I tentatively conclude that Jung held the concept of law as natural law.Thesis of SungLi(性卽理) is an ontological perspective of human nature. This perspective explain that agent`s acts are under the control of universal and unconditional laws. However, Jung denied this thesis, and he recognized the individual desire. Also, he realized the human mind to get the enjoyment and exercise of freedom and rights.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089344127