메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Ziying Li (Sungkyunkwan University) Nayoun Kim (Sungkyunkwan University)
저널정보
담화·인지언어학회 담화와인지 담화와인지 제30권 제4호
발행연도
2023.11
수록면
101 - 124 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this study, we conducted a selfpaced reading experiment to explore how a locally coherent structure formed by an animate temporally ambiguous noun phrase (DP) and its subsequent verb guides the reanalysis of the ambiguous DP. In the sentence “While the police was investigating the detective examined by the lawyer an officer opened the door,” the DP “the detective” following the ambitransitive verb “investigate” is temporally ambiguous in its syntactic position: it can be the direct object (DO) of “investigate” or the matrix subject (MS) of the main clause. This temporary syntactic ambiguity can be resolved upon encountering the DP “an officer,” which allows only the DO analysis of “the detective.” Following previous studies (cf. Phillips 1995), the DO analysis of “the detective” is initially preferred. This is compatible with the later appearing DP “an officer,” which should be the MS of the main clause. However, processing difficulty was observed when the DP “an officer” was encountered. This suggests that readers performed the MS reanalysis of the DP “the detective” before encountering the disambiguating DP “an officer.” In comparison, no processing difficulty was observed when the temporally ambiguous DP was inanimate (“the evidence”). This suggests that animacy plays a role in forming the local coherence (cf. Tabor et al. 2004) that leads to the reanalysis of the temporally DO/MS ambiguous DP.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Background: Influence of Local Coherence on Syntactic Processingand Sentence Comprehension
3. Our study: Testing the Influence of Local Coherence on the Reanalysis Process of Temporally DO/MS Ambiguous Noun Phrase
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-088487187