메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Nayoun Kim (Sungkyunkwan University) Michael Frazier (University of Leipzig)
저널정보
담화·인지언어학회 담화와인지 담화와인지 제30권 제4호
발행연도
2023.11
수록면
29 - 54 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The understanding of elliptical constructions, in which material not present in the phonological or written form of a sentence is nonetheless present in its interpretation, presents a number of challenges for the sentence processing system. Specifically, upon identifying a Noun Phrase Ellipsis construction, readers must identify the antecedent in the memory and retrieve its contents (Kim, Brehm, and Yoshida 2019, Kim and Frazier 2023). In this study, based on Kim and Frazier (2023), we investigated the time-course of elliptical dependency resolution with strict/sloppy identity ambiguity using an eye-tracking while reading experiment, to distinguish what is retrieved in antecedent retrieval at earlier from later stages in processing and how retrieval proceeds. Our results revealed that the strict identity interpretation is preferred at initial stages of processing, indicating that coreference information is retrieved from memory (Kim and Frazier 2023). However, the sloppy identity interpretation shows clear signs of being entertained in later eye-tracking measures as well as in later regions, suggesting that coreference information is temporally prioritized over morphological cues in cue-based retrieval system of content-addressable memory access (Lewis, Vasishth, and Van Dyke 2006; Martin and McElree 2008, 2011). Our result supports Kim and Frazier’s (2023) overall conclusions regarding the parser’s prioritization and the representational content it can access in antecedent retrieval, and extends this finding to later stages of antecedent-ellipsis integration, when information accessible to the parser less rapidly can be integrated into the ongoing parse.

목차

1. Introduction
2. The Present Study
3. Experiment
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-088487150