메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Cai Meng-Xi (Department of Gastroenterology Digestive Endoscopy Center Changhai Hospital Naval Medical University Shanghai ChinaNational Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System Shanghai China) Gao Ye (Department of Gastroenterology Digestive Endoscopy Center Changhai Hospital Naval Medical University Shanghai ChinaNational Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System Shanghai China) Li Li (Digestive Endoscopy Center The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University Luzhou China) Feng Wen (Digestive Endoscopy Center The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University Luzhou China) Wang Yi-Lin (Georgetown Preparatory School North Bethesda MD USA) Li Zhao-Shen (Department of Gastroenterology Digestive Endoscopy Center Changhai Hospital Naval Medical University Shanghai ChinaNational Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System Shanghai China) Xin Lei (Department of Gastroenterology Digestive Endoscopy Center Changhai Hospital Naval Medical University Shanghai ChinaNational Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System Shanghai China) Wang Luo-Wei (Department of Gastroenterology Digestive Endoscopy Center Changhai Hospital Naval Medical University Shanghai ChinaNational Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System Shanghai China)
저널정보
거트앤리버 발행위원회 Gut and Liver Gut and Liver 제17권 제3호
발행연도
2023.5
수록면
382 - 388 (7page)
DOI
10.5009/gnl220170

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background/Aims: We aimed to investigate the comfort, safety, and endoscopic visibility during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) afforded by a modified 4-hour semifluid and 2-hour water (“4+2”) fasting protocol. Methods: In this parallel group, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial, outpatients undergoing unsedated diagnostic EGD from 10:30 AM to 12:00 PM were randomly assigned to either a “4+2” protocol group or a conventional fasting group. The participants’ comfort during the fasting period and procedure was measured using the visual analog scale, and mucosal visibility was measured by endoscopists using the total visibility score. Satisfaction was defined as a visual analog scale score of ≤3. The primary outcome was the participants’ comfort during fasting. Results: One hundred and six and 108 participants were randomized to the “4+2” protocol and control groups, respectively. Participants’ comfort before EGD was significantly higher in the “4+2” protocol group measured by both the proportion of satisfaction (86.8% vs 63.9%, p=0.002) and the visual analog scale score (median [interquartile range]: 1.0 [1.0–2.0] vs 3.0 [1.0–4.0], p<0.001). The proportion of satisfaction during EGD also significantly improved (59.4% vs 45.4%, p=0.039) in the “4+2” protocol group. The total visibility score was unaffected by the fasting protocol (5.0 [4.0–5.0] vs 4.0 [4.0–5.0], p=0.266). No adverse events were observed during the study. Conclusions: The “4+2” protocol was more comfortable and provided equal mucosal visibility and safety compared with conventional fasting for unsedated EGD. (

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0