메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Technical Tips for Minimally Invasive Fusion Surgery
Recommendations
Search

최소 침습 기법을 이용한 요추 유합술

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Sang-Min Park (분당서울대학교병원 정형외과학교실) Hyun-Jin Park (한림대학교 강남성심병원 정형외과학교실) Ki Hyoung Koo (참조은병원 정형외과) Jae-Young Hong (고려대학교) Soo Taek Lim (예손병원 정형외과) The Korean Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (K-MISS) Study Group (예손병원 정형외과)
Journal
대한척추외과학회 대한척추외과학회지 대한척추외과학회지 제30권 제1호 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2023.3
Pages
34 - 43 (10page)

Usage

cover
Technical Tips for Minimally Invasive Fusion Surgery
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
Study Design: Review article Objectives: To introduce minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques and to review previous studies about these techniques. Summary of Literature Review: Recent trends indicate an increase in the use of MIS for spinal fusion. According to reports, MIS reduces postoperative morbidity, with surgical outcomes comparable to those of conventional spine surgery. Furthermore, there are reportedly fewer complications and pain after surgery, resulting in a rapid return to everyday life. Materials and Methods: A review of the relevant articles. Results: MIS techniques, such as biportal endoscopy, the use of a tubular retractor, and the anterior approach, have recently become increasingly popular. Access to the intervertebral disc through the intervertebral foramen is a characteristic shared by biportal endoscopy and the use of a tubular retractor. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that procedures employing a tubular retractor yield clinical and radiographic outcomes comparable to those of conventional open spine surgery. Biportal endoscopy is still undergoing clinical investigations, and its safety and efficacy have not yet been established. Anterior approach fusion is mainly used in patients with mild central canal stenosis; thus, its indications are somewhat limited compared to conventional posterior fusion. However, additional decompression after anterior approach fusion allows both direct and indirect decompression to be obtained. Conclusions: With MIS, patients’ satisfaction after surgery is high due to the small amount of bleeding during surgery and limited damage to surrounding anatomical structures. However, these MIS techniques have narrow indications, and we must accurately understand the disadvantages and limitations of each technique.

Contents

No content found

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.