메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
남옥정 (조선대학교)
저널정보
한국중동학회 한국중동학회논총 한국중동학회논총 제43권 제3호
발행연도
2023.2
수록면
1 - 24 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The post-Ba’th Party Iraqi political system accepted consociationalism, which guarantees the participation of conflicting groups in the government, as an irreplaceable alternative way of peacebuilding, rather than integrationism, which favors majority rule to integrate various groups within a country. The characteristics of the majority model of Westminster democracy, which is regarded as integrationism, are competition and exclusion, but consociational model emphasizes participation, negotiation, and compromise. Muhasasa Taifiya is a power-sharing system known as consociationalism and has been adopted as the basis for the establishment to be a sectarian apportionment of political positions since when the US-led Iraqi government was formed in 2003. The 2021 Iraqi parliamentary election revealed the sectarian conflict between Iraq's Shi'ites groups. The principle of majority rule envisioned by Sadr, who won the 2021 election, was essentially a partially adopted consociationalism that attempted to exclude the rival Shia faction from the government plan. As a result, Maliki and the Coordination Framework, rival Shia coalition that have been given legitimacy for political power based on Muhasasa, were given opportunities to continue to maintain consociationalism and come to power. Enforceable compromise between consociationalism rule and majority rule in Iraq's current institutions are expected to be limited.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0