메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이기 (홍익대학교 대학원 공간디자인전공 박사수료) 조택연 (홍익대학교 미술대학 산업디자인학과 교수)
저널정보
한국디자인트렌드학회 한국디자인포럼 한국디자인포럼 제28권 제2호
발행연도
2023.5
수록면
149 - 161 (13page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background Several studies have shown that architects and consumers have different preferences in appreciating the same architectural forms. Such differences in aesthetic awareness exist in other works of art but appear to be more pronounced in architectural forms because, unlike art forms with relatively small audiences, architecture is a product of mass aesthetic awareness consumption. These differences can have a more serious impact on the appreciators of architectural forms. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the reasons for such differences. Methods This study first reanalyzes data from a survey of architects and consumers on architectural aesthetic preferences and identifies aesthetic differences between these two groups, primarily in the functionalist style of architecture. Second, the analysis of the educational system revealed that the geometric language of form, which has had a continuous influence on functionalism, may be one of the reasons for the differences in aesthetic awareness. Third, the ventral visual (HSF) pathway of the brain for stylistic processing was analyzed, and it was found that both the neostriatum associated with visual habits and the ventral striatum associated with reward mechanisms play a role in the stylistic process. Therefore, this study argues that the familiarity with the language of geometric shapes developed in the education of architects is one of the reasons for the differences in architectural aesthetics. Fourth, to establish this claim, a questionnaire experiment was conducted, and a correlation analysis of the results proved a significant correlation between familiarity with the language of geometric shapes and architectural aesthetic outcomes. Result Based on the above analysis, one of the reasons for the difference between architects' and consumers' aesthetic awareness of functionalist architectural forms is the variability in familiarity with the language of geometric shape design in the educational process. Conclusion This study argues that the geometric familiarity brought about through stylistic education affects the visual aesthetic awareness of architects. This geometry-based design education is not through recognition of the beautiful structures found but rather develops into a style that can be perceived as beautiful in its stylistic value. But this sense of beauty is perceptually differentiated by differences in people's experiences. Consumers form visual memories from everyday visual experiences and architects' visual memories from geometric modeling education. As a result of this learning, the architect's sense of beauty has a tendency to fail to meet the consumer's general sense of beauty.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0