메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Ha-Won Jang (Kyung Hee University) Meehee Cho (Kyung Hee University)
저널정보
한국조리학회 Culinary Science & Hospitality Research Culinary Science & Hospitality Research Vol.29 No.9(Wn.158)
발행연도
2023.9
수록면
28 - 40 (13page)
DOI
10.20878/cshr.2023.29.9.004

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This research delves into the use of blockchains among employees in the Korean food industry to foster growth and development within the sector. Despite widespread attention from academia and industry, the use of blockchain technology remains limited in many companies. To comprehend the decision-making process behind this use, the study employs the Technology Readiness Index (TRI) model, encompassing facilitators (optimism and innovativeness) and inhibitors (insecurity and discomfort) related to blockchains. By investigating the causal relationship between employees" optimism, innovativeness, insecurity, discomfort, attitudes, and their intent to use blockchains, the study sheds light on key factors influencing decisions related to its use. The TRI model, a well-established framework in academia for assessing individuals" opinions on emerging technologies, serves as the foundation for this analysis. Data was collected through an online survey targeting employees in the food industry, with 328 responses utilized for the final analysis. The results indicated that employees" optimism and innovativeness towards blockchains had a positive influence on their attitudes. However, insecurity and discomfort did not significantly impact attitudes on blockchains. Nonetheless, employees’ attitudes were found to be a strong predictor of the intent to use blockchains. This study yields valuable academic and practical implications for the Korean food industry"s blockchain use, while acknowledging certain limitations.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. INTRODUCTION
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
3. METHOD
4. RESULTS
5. IMPLICATIONS AND DISCUSSIONS
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (40)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0