지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Japanese central government has actively intended to introduce social integration policies for foreigners since the 2010s. However, immigration control against Zainichi Koreans was virtually a synonym of the postwar Japanese immigration policy. This article discusses that Japan"s strict immigration control and assimilation policies against Koreans, "the initial immigrants," conflict with its proactive social integration policy in the 2010s accepting diversity.
The growth of the foreign population growth and its transnationalization has accelerated significantly since the 2010s. It derives from aging, population decline, and labor shortage. Demands for social integration of foreign populations have been a realm of local governments; however, the central government began to take the initiative in 2018. The establishment of the Immigration Bureau of Japan and the building of a series of social integration policies are examples.
Meanwhile, however, on the one hand, the central government has been stingy in guaranteeing the rights of foreigners, including denying the principle of internal and external equality under international human rights norms and educational opportunities to foster foreign identity, which constitute the right to personality, to hinder the advancement of the rights and interests of Zainichi Koreans for a long time. Therefore, the more the central government is to advance the rights of foreigners, the more it would give rise to contradiction to the measures of continuity from the "empire" against the people of the former colonies.
The growth of the foreign population growth and its transnationalization has accelerated significantly since the 2010s. It derives from aging, population decline, and labor shortage. Demands for social integration of foreign populations have been a realm of local governments; however, the central government began to take the initiative in 2018. The establishment of the Immigration Bureau of Japan and the building of a series of social integration policies are examples.
Meanwhile, however, on the one hand, the central government has been stingy in guaranteeing the rights of foreigners, including denying the principle of internal and external equality under international human rights norms and educational opportunities to foster foreign identity, which constitute the right to personality, to hinder the advancement of the rights and interests of Zainichi Koreans for a long time. Therefore, the more the central government is to advance the rights of foreigners, the more it would give rise to contradiction to the measures of continuity from the "empire" against the people of the former colonies.
목차
1. 서론
2. 일본 인구 추세와 외국인 사회통합정책
3. 이민사회를 대비하기 위한 출입국관리 체계
4. ‘최초의 이민’에 대한 시책과의 연속성
5. 결론
참고문헌
要旨
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
‘관계의 예술’과 지역 - 일본 지역예술제의 관계성을 중심으로 -
신민정
,
이호상
일본문화연구
2023
.07
일본의 대인도-아세안 산업협력 및 국제무역 구조의 변화와 시사점
최정환
이슈페이퍼
2023
.02
개화기 일본식 한자어를 통한 신문물 유입에 관한 연구 -일본인 편찬 일본어 학습서의 분석을 중심으로-
황운
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2023
.04
일본사회의 외국인 ‘혐오’와 혼혈 - －‘국제아’, ‘더블’ 담론의 이분법과 ‘아시아계’ 혼혈 -
박이진
일본문화연구
2023
.04
대일평화조약 형성과정에서 일본 정부의 영토 인식과 대응 분석 : “고유영토 다케시마(독도)” 영유 의사의 검증
장박진
영토해양연구
2011
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0102-2023-913-001986912