지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Numerous studies have explored the meanings/functions of the particles ‘un/nun’ (simply ‘nun’) and ‘i/ka’ (simply ‘ka’) in Korean, with most concurring that ‘nun’ is a topic marker and ‘ka’ is a focus marker. However, a recent study by Park and Yeon (2023) proposed an alternative account, suggesting that both ‘nun’ and ‘ka’ encode both focus and topic and that the relationship between these particles and a topic/focus status is orthogonal. This paper presents a pragmatic approach, positing that ‘ka’ is simply a case marker, whereas ‘nun’ marks old information. Other interpretations of these particles are inferred through pragmatic considerations. Not all instances of old information are marked with ‘nun.’ Instead, the choice between ‘ka’ and ‘nun’ depends on the speaker’s considerations of optimal relevance, as defined and used in relevance theory. The marking of old information may save the hearer’s processing effort and, consequently, enhance the overall degree of relevance. Conversely, the absence of this marking would take more processing effort, which might be compensated by additional cognitive effects. A small experiment conducted and several translations of English literature into Korean will show that this pragmatic account can deal with a wider range of phrases used with ‘nun’ and ‘ka.’
목차
1. 서론
2. ‘는’과 ‘가’의 이전 연구
3. ‘는’과 ‘가’에 대한 화용론적 설명
4. 번역에서 본 ‘는’과 ‘가’의 사용
5. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0