메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
신봉기 전기성
저널정보
한국토지공법학회 토지공법연구 토지공법연구 제42집
발행연도
2008.11
수록면
545 - 573 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The government has implemented a levy on tobacco consumption (hereafter tobacco levy) and is currently considering increasing the tax rate 61% to 70% of tobacco price. This has raised a lot of arguments since this tobacco levy is different from other typical levies. We conducted this study to investigate whether the legal bases used to support the collecting of this tobacco levy is constitution or not.This study covers the legal characteristics of tobacco levy. the current system, which gives the rationals for the tobacco levy(the national health promotion fund), and a critical review on the legal aspect of the tobacco levy and its current use. A typical levy can be legally supported by 3 criteria; Are individuals who pay tobacco levy (hereafter levy-payer) homogenous enough to be treated as a group?; Levy-payers have more responsibility than the general public with regards direct as well as sufficient benefits from the levy?The main findings of this study are as follows:Firstly, it is unreasonable that actual levy-payers who pay the tobacco levy are end consumers who buy cigarettes. it is because the tobacco business or industry has a legal obligation to pay this levy but they just transfer it to the end consumer so that they do not pay the levy at sll. End consumers cannot be treated as a homogenous group .Secondly, it is unreasonable that tobacco consumers(levy-payers) have more responsibility to promote public health and/or are more responsibility for public health.Thirdly, it is unreasonable that end consumers as well as tobacco businesses not get sufficient benefits from the levy. The fund is mainly used for other general public uses. Moreover, current health insurance law prohibit reimbursement for smoking cessation. It is contradictory to the national health promotion law, which prescribes that the levy must be used for smoking related disease.There is no strong legal support for the tobacco levy. The current system on tobacco taxation would require a legal amendment.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0102-2023-363-001984612