지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In previous studies, the syntactic and semantic properties that characterize Double Object Constructions (DOC) and Pre/Postpositional Dative Constructions (PDC) were mainly based on English data. Nonetheless, there is empirical evidence that challenges several received claims that seem not to fully account for the (un)acceptability of DOCs in other languages. That is, the dative arguments in Korean and Spanish exhibit similar and different syntactic behaviors (e.g., (un)acceptability of passivized DOCs with accusative marker -ul/lul in Korean vs (un)acceptability of passivized DOCs with dative clitic doubling). This study presents results obtained from an acceptability judgment task to investigate whether and to what extent the syntactic class of the verb affects acceptability of Korean DOCs in which the accusative case marker -(l)ul appears on more than one NP in a single sentence in Korean (Yi & Park, 2022). Despite syntactic similarities in the two languages, few studies have investigated experimentally the crosslinguistic conditions that constrain the two types of DOCs in the two languages; particularly none of the studies has examined which factors affect the acceptability of DOCs in Spanish. Therefore, the study also examined two accounts of Spanish DOCs by investigating whether the presence of the dative clitic influences the structural change of dative constructions. Results of the Experiment 1 show that although native speakers of Korean were more accepting of the post-prepositional dative sentences than of the DOCs, the acceptability was affected by the syntactic class of the verb (ditransitive verb vs V+V compound verb (transitive verb + cwu- ‘give’)) and that the acceptability rating was gradient rather than strictly binary. Results of the Experiment 2 show that native speakers of Spanish were more accepting of non-clitic doubled sentences than of clitic doubled sentences and that the acceptability rating was gradient, supporting Pineda’s (2020a) account. Altogether, the results shown in the acceptability rating suggests that although a varying degree of productivity exists across the two languages, there are two types of DOCs in these languages.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Previous Approaches to Korean and Spanish DOCs
3. Present Study
4. General Discussion and Future Study
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
漢文科에서의 傳統的 價値觀 授業 方案 硏究- Google Docs 활용을 기반으로 -
漢字漢文敎育
2018 .01
-
A Principled Explanation on Double Object and Dative Constructions
영미어문학
2018 .09
-
영어 이중목적어 구문의 지향형의 구조, 의미와 의미역 자질
언어과학
2016 .01
-
Students’ Perceived Comfort in Using Google Docs for Online Synchronous Collaborative Writing
Journal of Asia TEFL
2021 .01
-
스페인어 목적대명사 교육에 대한 제언
언어과학연구
2019 .09
-
Google Docs를 활용한 일본어 작문 수업 -코로나19 이후 대면수업을 중심으로-
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2023 .04
-
A Comparative Analysis of English and Chinese DOCs
영어영문학
2019 .05
-
Word order contrast in German, Korean, and Chinese DOC: pied-piping and (un)saturation
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2022 .11
-
스페인어 접어뭉치의 통사적 분석
스페인어문학
2018 .01
-
Variation in Double Object Formation with Dative Verbs: English vs. Korean
영어학
2021 .01
-
Syntactic Distribution of the Semantic Classes of Dative Verbs in English and Cantonese: A Crosslinguistic Perspective
언어
2021 .06
-
The Personality Traits of Korean Undergraduate Students and Their Participation in Classroom: The Use of Google Docs and TV Series The Office
영상영어교육(STEM Journal)
2018 .01
-
A Reanalysis of the Double Object Constructions in Mandarin Chinese - Using the Light verb Phrase and Applicative Phrase
한국중어중문학 우수논문집
2021 .11
-
비대면 수업의 블렌디드 러닝 실천 연구 - 패드렛과 구글 문서 활용을 중심으로 -
일본문화학보
2022 .05
-
접어 se의 상적 속성에 관한 연구
언어연구
2015 .01
-
접어의 형성
언어학 연구
2017 .04
-
한국어 모어 화자와 학습자의 여격 구문 문장 처리 연구
국어국문학
2023 .12
-
Acceptability Judgments of Double Case-Marking Constructions in Korean
언어와 정보
2017 .07
-
한국인 L2화자의 여격 구문 인식에 관한 연구
새한영어영문학
2015 .08
-
Processing Double Accusatives with Korean Dative/Causative Verbs: An ERP Study
현대문법연구
2021 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0102-2023-701-001744807