지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (6)
2017
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper deals with the debate on the relationship between mysticism and ethics, which is conducted by American scholars. They asked "Why did mystics who are claimed to have extraordinary religious experience cause an ethical scandal?" In fact, the ethical status of mysticism is an old question in religious history The core of the debate has been set on the relationship between the monistic mystical tradition and ethics. Jeffrey J. Kripal argues that there are no necessary connection between mysticism and ethics, which is clearly demonstrated in the case of monistic mysticism of the Orient such as Hinduism. William Bernard counter-argues that mystical experience has ethical implications and make mystics more ethical.
The debate shows the interrelationship of mysticism and ethics is not clear. If mysticism surely functions as the basis for an ethical life, the debate itself would not even be started at all. The mystical experience should be interpreted and be integrated into one’s life properly. The debate enable us to have a better view over the puzzling relationship between mysticism and ethics.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0