메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김회용 (부산대학교)
저널정보
부산대학교 교육발전연구소 교육혁신연구 교육혁신연구 제26권 제3호
발행연도
2016.12
수록면
83 - 101 (19page)
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.26.3.201612.83

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: The contribution of this paper lies in that Oakeshott (1901∼1990) proposes a new view of political thought: the politics is the pursuit of an intimation. Method: To do this, this paper analyzed Oakeshott’s political thought and his criticism on Rationalist politics. Results: This new political view can be seen as a paradigm instead of the traditional views of rationalist politics. And the traditional political view of rationalism of the West has experienced the process from “the pursuit of good politics” of ancient Greece to “the pursuit of utilitarian politics” of modern times (that is to say, virtue is no longer to be the “king” of the political philosophy, rationality has occupied its position), the dilemma of this political view lies in the confusing of the problems of “fact-value distinction”. For this reason, Oakeshott believes that politics is a sort of practical activity for the participation in an arrangements. On one hand, the tradition of behavior is an arrangement, on the other hand, it is also unfinished. Conclusion: In this sense, the theory of politics is a kind of theory about the intimations of a tradition of behavior. Beginning from the interpretation of the political activity itself, this paper examines the political view of rationalism through the analysis of the theory of intimation and its implications.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0