지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Nowadays computer and internet are extremely important in our daily life. Convenience created by technological innovation brings us to the computer-related environment. As commercial transactions depend on more computers and other information technologies, competition law needs to develop a new survey methodology that is consistent with the new trend. Due to sophisticated computers, technological innovation will be accelerated, and competition law regulatory agencies will face greater burden as competition environment change significantly.
In 2015 the U.S. Department of Justice (hereinafter DOJ) investigated the allegation of pricing fixing in Amazon marketplace and accused. In 2016, in Eturas case, the European Court of Justice (hereinafter ECJ) determined that the development of innovative technological markets is important in cartel’s agreement.
As the pricing power is transferred from undertaking to a pricing algorithm, a major concern in competition law is that algorithm will foment cartel (particularly conscious parallelism), and thus, price competition will be less meaningful. Due to the transparency, which is a characteristic of a digital market, algorithm changes the mobility and agility of a market and encourages implicit consent among market players. Market players have a sufficient incentive to transfer the pricing power to a computer. It can be said that an algorithm damages competition, particularly when the algorithm ignores a market price, does not respond to changes in a market, and acts solely for the market players’ pursuance of profits.
Accordingly, when the government carries out competition policies, the government needs to examine whether “agreement” or “intent” under the competition law is suitable for the new era. In addition, the government should seriously consider to what extent competition law regulatory agencies intervene in innovative industries.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
AI 등을 활용한 사업자간 담합과 경쟁법의 대응
경쟁법연구
2018 .01
-
알고리즘을 이용한 담합의 규제
경쟁법연구
2019 .01
-
Challenges and changes for competition authorities during and post COVID-19
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2020 .06
-
Horizontal Agreements and Cartels in EU Competition Law
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2015 .12
-
Innovation and Competition: A Case Study Analysis
KIET Industrial Economic Review
2022 .12
-
The Recent Enforcement of Competition Law Damages Actions in the European Union
EU연구
2015 .01
-
Achieving Inclusive and Innovative Growth with Competition Policies
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2022 .01
-
European Competition Law Annual 2013: Effective and Legitimate Enforcement of Competition Law
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2016 .12
-
The Issue of Information Exchanges Regarding Price under Competition Law : Comments on the Supreme Court’s Judgment on the Ramen Cartel from a Comparative Perspective
법학논총
2016 .07
-
Competition on the internet
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2015 .12
-
Competition On the Internet
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2015 .12
-
2019년 경쟁법 중요판례평석
인권과 정의
2020 .01
-
The Meaning of Fair Trade Law in the Ḥisbah System: A Comparative Perspective
중동문제연구
2019 .01
-
Analysis of Competition Policies between U.S. and EU in the Era of Inter-Industry Convergence
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2021 .04
-
국가개입 수출카르텔 관련 경쟁법과 WTO법의 충돌?조화 문제 - 중국 수출카르텔 관련 미국 반독점법 사건과 WTO 사건의 시사점 -
법학논집
2016 .12
-
Intellectual Property and Competition Law
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2016 .12
-
판례에 나타난 공정거래법상 경쟁 및 경쟁제한성의 개념과 기준
사법
2024 .03
-
EU의 제약산업에 대한 경쟁법 집행 및 경쟁정책과 그 시사점
한국비교정부학보
2019 .01
-
유통 4.0 시대의 경쟁이슈
경쟁법연구
2019 .01
-
중국의 농산물 수출가격 차별 행위 분석 : 마늘과 콩을 중심으로
농업경영.정책연구
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0