메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김보람 (Department of Psychiatry College of Medicine Yeungnam University Daegu Korea) 정현석 (영남대학교) 조소혜 (Department of Psychiatry College of Medicine Yeungnam University Daegu Korea) 윤석호 (Department of Psychiatry College of Medicine Yeungnam University Daegu Korea) 김혜금 (Department of Psychiatry College of Medicine Yeungnam University Daegu Korea) 구본훈 (Department of Psychiatry College of Medicine Yeungnam University Daegu Korea)
저널정보
한국정신분석학회 정신분석 정신분석 제32권 제4호
발행연도
2021.10
수록면
142 - 154 (13page)
DOI
10.18529/psychoanal.2021.32.4.142

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objectives: In this study, we divided the types of depression, focusing on defense mechanisms based on psychodynamic theory, and then explored the clinical and psychological characteristics of each group. Methods: We recruited 619 patients with depression. Cluster analysis according to defense mechanisms was conducted on each group. Defense mechanisms were rated based on the defense style questionnaire (DSQ). We compared psychological characteristics between the groups using The symptom check- list-90-revised (SCL-90-R), Beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck anxiety inventory (BAI), The Minnesota multiphasic per- sonality inventory-2 (MMPI-2), temperament and character inventory (TCI), and personality disorder questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+). Results: DSQ results showed significant differences between the groups. Groups 1 and 2 had high levels of passive aggression, acting out, and omnipotence. Group 1 had higher affiliation and use the most immature defense mechanisms. Group 3 had high- er projective identification and no other defense mechanisms. In SCL-90-R, BDI-II, and BAI, the severity of the symptoms was in the order of Group 1, 2, and 3. In MMPI-2, there were no significant differences between Group 1 and 2, but Group 1 had higher psychopathic deviate, Schizophrenia, and Hypomania. In TCI, Group 1 was the most temperamental, followed by Group 2 and Group 3 was the least temperament. In PDQ-4+, schizoid, schizotypal, antisocial, and borderline personality disorder were higher in Group 1. Conclusion: In the Kernberg’s borderline personality organization, Group 1 is close to the borderline and psychotic personality organization, Group 2 can be termed as borderline and neurotic personality organization. Group 3 can be termed as a neurotic personality organization.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (54)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0