메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김유진 (이화여자대학교) 전루민 (이화여자대학교) 한경은 (이화여자대학교)
저널정보
대한안과학회 Korean Journal of Ophthalmology Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 제35권 제5호
발행연도
2021.10
수록면
337 - 348 (12page)
DOI
10.3341/kjo.2021.0076

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: To evaluate the compatibility of corneal curvature and astigmatism, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) measuredby the Scheimpflug camera Pentacam HR and the swept-source optical coherence tomography ANTERION. Methods: This prospective study included normal subjects with no ophthalmic history. Steep keratometry (K), flat K, astigmatismand its axis of the anterior and posterior surfaces, total corneal power, and HOAs using the two instruments werecompared. To compare the mean values of the measurements, a paired t-test was used. Bland-Altman analysis was applied toassess the agreement between the two devices. Results: Fifty-three eyes of 53 subjects were evaluated. There were statistically significant differences for steep K, astigmatism,and vector J0, J45 in the anterior surface and total corneal power between the two devices (p < 0.05). There werealso significant differences in the most of the keratometric values of the posterior corneal surface (p < 0.05) except J0 (p =0.410). Both devices showed strong positive correlations in steep K, flat K, astigmatism (r > 0.81, p < 0.001) with wide rangesof a 95% limit of agreement. Vectoral components were significantly correlated (r > 0.78, p < 0.001) with narrow 95% limit ofagreement, except J45 of the posterior surface (r = 0.39, p = 0.004). In the corneal HOAs, there were statistically significantdifferences in the vertical coma, horizontal trefoil, spherical aberration, and root mean square of each fifth- and sixth-orderZernike coefficient (p = 0.043, p = 0.041, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Other HOAs showed moderateto strong positive correlations (r > 0.37, p < 0.05). Most HOAs, except for the horizontal trefoil, showed clinically acceptableagreements. The total root mean square of HOAs was not significantly different between the two devices (p = 0.122). Conclusions: Most of the keratometric values cannot be used interchangeably. However, the vectoral component of astigmatismshowed clinically good agreement. Several HOAs have statistically significant differences; however, almost all HOAsshowed acceptable agreements, except for the horizontal trefoil.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (39)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0