지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Unlike the mother-child relationship, the father-son/daughter relationship is not attributed to the fact of childbirth. Therefore, not only the sincerity of blood relationship, but also the welfare of the son/daughter, the intention of the parents and the relationship between them, etc., should be taken into consideration to attribute the father-son/ daughter relationship. Moreover, the change of thinking (e.g. Same-sex marriage) and the development of science-technology suggest the possibility of the formation of a new family relationship, and the factors to be considered for the father-son/daughter relationship are bound to increase accordingly. In addition, these factors need to be considered not only for the attribution of the father-son/daughter relationship, but also for resolving the already vested father-son/daughter relationship. If the interpretation of our law makes these changes and developments unacceptable, amendments to the law should also be considered. However, if any problem has to be resolved at this point without such amendments, interpretation of the law and the parties’ intentions must be made within the current legal system, and these factors for considerations can only have an effect within the system. In particular, since the judgment of the Supreme Court is not only a conclusion of the case, but also an important standard in interpreting the law and the parties’ intentions in similar situations, a serious approach to whether or not it contradicts the existing judgment is required. Basically, through the 2019 ruling, we can sympathize with how the Supreme Court of Korea has gone through the process of in-depth analysis of the case and led to the result. In particular, it is possible to agree on the need to secure the welfare of the son/daughter. However, in this paper, the question was raised as to whether this interpretation of the Supreme Court is possible within our legal system at this time, and the following conclusions were reached.
First, since the written consent of the father, which is carried out according to the current Bioethics And Safety Act, is consent to the embryo-generating medical institution, consent between the husband and wife must be secured for artificial insemination. To clarify this, it is necessary to legislate the consent in the form of notarization as in Article 152 of the Austrian Civil Code.
Second, the consent of the father is a form similar to the consent of adoption, and it is a kind of indication for establishing a father-son/ daughter relationship by a intention, and it can be seen as a contract for a third person based on Article 539 KBGB, in which the person who was born becomes a third person. Accordingly, the father bears a contractual obligation to nurture the child as well as the biological child.
Third, since Article 844 (1) KBGB presumes that a child conceived by a wife during marriage is the husband's child, the assumption is made even in the case of artificial insemination. However, the father's right to deny paternity cannot be given up as an exclusive right.
Fourth, even if the father’s right to deny paternity is exercised and the father’s paternity is denied, contractual responsibilities must be continuously borne, which may be subject to change of circumstances.
This method of interpretation is made within the system of our law, and I think that the welfare of the son/daughter that our Supreme Court was trying to secure can be guaranteed through this as well. However, as can be seen from the background of the introduction of Article 1600 (4) BGB, it is necessary to exclude the right to deny paternity to fathers who have consented to artificial insemination through the revision of the Korean Civil Code. This is because not only the custody of a son/ daughter born through artificial insemination, but also the status of inheritance can be secured.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (53)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
생부의 친생부인권과 임시출생신고에 관한 입법론
가족법연구
2024 .03
-
『심청전』의 부녀관계와 서사구조
동아시아문화연구
2019 .01
-
내러티브 탐구를 통해 본 청소년기 아버지 사별 경험이 성인여성의 성장에 미친 영향
상담학연구
2020 .02
-
민법상 친자관계의 결정
법학논총
2018 .01
-
창작 그림책에 묘사된 아버지 인물 분석
유아교육연구
2016 .01
-
이혼 가정 딸의 시각에서 본 모녀 상호간의 신화(myth)에 관한 사례연구: 상담에의 함의
한국가족복지학
2018 .01
-
한국 아버지의 자녀 돌봄 시간: 자녀 연령대에 따른 경제적 의존성과 성역할 인식의 영향을 중심으로
한국가족관계학회지
2020 .01
-
청소년기 아들의 아버지와의 관계 체험에 관한 연구
가족과 문화
2016 .01
-
유아기 자녀를 둔 아버지의 행복에 관련된 변인 탐색
한국가족관계학회지
2016 .01
-
장모-사위 쌍 비교를 통한 모녀분화와 장모-사위 결속도 및 관계만족도 연구
Human Ecology Research
2017 .01
-
그룬트비의 ‘살아있는 상호작용’ 원리로 본 유아기 자녀를 둔 아버지 교육의 함의 모색
생태유아교육연구
2020 .01
-
아버지의 놀이참여도가 유아의 사회적 유능성과 자기조절능력에 미치는 영향
한국보육지원학회지
2016 .01
-
방송 상품에서 문화적 정서로 인한 한국인 시어머니와 외국인 며느리의 심리적 거리
상품학연구
2019 .01
-
다문화가정의 고부갈등 양상: EBS 〈다문화고부열전〉에 나타난 고부갈등을 중심으로
다문화사회연구
2020 .10
-
구례 유씨가의 친정 왕래와 그 요인들
지역사회학
2021 .12
-
Experiences of Fathers Raising Young Children with Disabilities: Conflicts, Difficulties, and Positive Changes
International Journal of Early Childhood Education
2015 .01
-
An Examination of Communication Motives and Relationship Maintenance Behaviors in Thai and US Father-Daughter Relationships
Asian Communication Research
2016 .06
-
아버지와 자녀의 가족식사 빈도에 영향을 미치는 요인
Human Ecology Research
2018 .01
-
‘혼인종료 후 300일 이내에 출생한 子’의 친생추정에 관한 연구
가족법연구
2015 .03
-
혼인 중인 여자와 남편 아닌 자 사이에서 출생한 자녀에 대한 생부의 출생신고
가족법연구
2024 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0