A Study on the Precedents Changing Related to Using Medical Devices of Korean Medicine Doctors

Jeongsu Park; Kichang Oh; Sanghyuk Kwon; Hongmin Chu; Jungsang Kim

doi:https://doi.org/10.22246/jikm.2021.42.6.1303

A Study on the Precedents Changing Related to Using Medical Devices of Korean Medicine Doctors

Recommendations

Search

한의사 의료기기 사용과 관련된 판례 및 기존 연구 분석과 경향 변화

Type: Academic journal

Author: Jeongsu Park (원광대학교 한의과대학) Kichang Oh (동국대학교 한의과대학) Sanghyuk Kwon (논산시 보건소) Hongmin Chu (옹진군 보건소) Jungsang Kim (로담한의원)

Journal: 대한한방내과학회 대한한방내과학회지 대한한방내과학회지 제42권 제6호 KCI Accredited Journals

Published: 2021.12

Pages: 1,303 - 1,318 (16page)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22246/jikm.2021.42.6.1303

Usage

A Study on the Precedents Changing Related to Using Medical Devices of Korean Medicine Doctors

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the debate on the use of medical devices between Western Medicine and Korean Medicine, as this is one of the greatest conflicts in Korea's medical profession. Judicial precedents and interpretations of authority serve as regulations because medical affairs law states that Korean Medicine practices are ambiguous. Method: We conducted a search in the Korean RISS, OASIS, and DBPIA databases using several keywords associated with medical devices, Korean Medicine, and Korean Medicine Doctors. The search period was until November 5 2021. The retrieved papers were classified according to the selection and exclusion criteria by checking the title, abstract, and text. For precedents, searches were done regarding comprehensive legal information, etc., and in the case of non-disclosure precedents, we requested access to the precedents by web-court requests. Results: A total of 80 documents were found as a result of the search, and 13 publications were included in the study. The selected publications were classified and analyzed by this research team into Korean medicine, Western medicine, and legal or state agency research. In the existing literature and judgments, the arguments that played a major role changed depending on the time the judgment was made. “Social conventions”, “curriculum”, “academic principles”, and “health and hygiene dangers” were the key arguments. Conclusions: Further studies will be needed that can comprehensively arrange the existing literature and clinical results, and continuous study will be needed to verify that the use of medical devices by Korean medicine doctors is helpful for prognosis and accurate treatment of their patients.

#Korean medicine #medical device #precedents

No content found

References (16)

Add References

김종영 / 2021 / 경계 작업에서 인프라 작업으로: 혼종 한의학과 의료기기 사용 분쟁의 정치 / 과학기술학연구 21(1):33~73

Park HC / 2016 / President Park Geun-hye stresses the need to boldly abolish key regulations blocking the growth of new industries / Akomnews

박용신 / 2019 / 한의사의 의료기기 사용과 주의의무에 있어서 한방의료행위의 새로운 이해 / 대한예방한의학회지 23(2):117~127

정현주 / 2019 / 판례 분석을 통한 한의사 의료기기 사용범위에 관한 한의학적 고찰 / 대한한방내과학회지 40(4):597~611

김한나 / 2018 / 의사‧한의사의 업무구분과 의료기기 활용에 관한 검토 / 아주법학 12(2):42~62

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!