메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박정구 (서울대학교) 소영 (인하대학교) 박성하 (경일대학교)
저널정보
한국중국언어학회 중국언어연구 중국언어연구 제95호
발행연도
2021.8
수록면
195 - 222 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
By closely comparing and analyzing the various and complex distributional properties of Chinese actuality adverbs ‘Zhen(?)’ and ‘Zhende(?的)’, this paper tried to prove what categorical functions the actuality adverbs have in addition to their modal meaning and to reveal what mechanism causes the functional extension. First of all, this paper presents a model of the epistemic modality of ‘?’ and ‘?的’, with two distinct worlds, the possible world and the real world. The epistemic modality expresses the speaker’s judgment on the degree to which an event or state established in the possible world matches the real world, and these two adverbs express his strong convictions about the correspondence between the real event and the possible event. Based on this model, it is possible to explain the extension of the degree-intensifying function of ‘Zhen(?)’. The mechanism reveals that the function of emphasizing the degree of a state was developed from cognitive reasoning inferred by the reinforcement of truth of an event or a state. This paper also suggests a new categorical characteristic of ‘Zhen(?)’. The most notable achievement is that we can suggest that ‘Zhen(?)’ has categorical properties such as evidentiality and mirativity, and explain the mechanism from linguistic typological perspective. The evidentiality of ‘Zhen(?)’ tells us that the information indicated by the proposition is not obtained indirectly, but that the speaker is the direct source of the information. In addition, the mirativity of ‘Zhen(?)’ indicates that the information conveyed by the speaker is unpredictable, new, contrary to the presupposition, and carrying the meaning of being surprised at the unexpected event. Through this analysis, this paper could logically and systematically explain the apparently exceptional and very complex function of ‘Zhen(?)’. The categories such as epistemic modality, evidentiality, and mirativity may or may not be expressed by grammatical markers cross-linguistically, and may or may not be clearly distinguished from each other. It can be said that Chinese is a type of language in which the grammatical markers rarely developed and the categories are not clearly distinguished from each other. This paper has great significance in proving that those categorial properties are involved in the functional development of actuality adverbs in Chinese and the categorial features can be captured by the co-occurring elements or context.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0