메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Chung Seockhoon (Department of Psychiatry Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Korea.) Kim Hwa Jung (Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan Colle) Ahn Myung Hee (Division of Psychiatry Health Screening and Promotion Center Asan Medical Center Seoul Korea.) Yeo Sungook (Department of Psychiatry Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Korea.) Lee Joohee (Department of Psychiatry Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Korea.) Kim Kyumin (Department of Psychiatry Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Korea.) Kang Solbi (Department of Psychology Sungshin Women's University Seoul Korea.) Suh Sooyeon (Department of Psychology Sungshin Women's University Seoul Korea.) Shin Yong-Wook (Department of Psychiatry Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Korea.)
저널정보
대한의학회 Journal of Korean Medical Science Journal of Korean Medical Science Vol.36 No.47
발행연도
2021.12
수록면
1 - 11 (11page)
DOI
10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e319

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019, or COVID-19, has had a major psychological impact on healthcare workers. However, very few scales are available to specifically assess work-related stress and anxiety in healthcare workers responding to a viral epidemic. This study developed a new assessment tool, the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics-9 (SAVE-9) and aimed to validate it among healthcare workers directly affected by COVID-19 in Korea. Methods: A total of 1,019 healthcare workers responded through anonymous questionnaires during April 20?30, 2020. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to explore the construct validity, and the reliability was assessed using internal consistency measures of Cronbach's alpha coefficients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to define the most appropriate cut-off point of SAVE-9 using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7; ≥ 5). Second, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to establish convergent validity for the SAVE-9 questionnaire with GAD-7 and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Results: The nine-item scale had satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.795). It adopted a two-factor structure: 1) anxiety regarding viral epidemics and 2) work-related stress associated with viral epidemics. A cut-off score of 22 for the SAVE-9 ascertained levels of stress and anxiety in response to a viral epidemic in healthcare workers that warranted clinical attention. Correlations between the SAVE-9 and the other scales were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The results suggest that the SAVE-9 is a useful, reliable, and valid tool to evaluate stress and anxiety responses in healthcare workers during viral epidemics.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0