지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article examines the development of the process by which Britain chose and established working relationships with her diplomatic Protecting Powers in the postwar years. The appropriate criteria for selecting a Protecting Power was established during Britain’s involvement in the Korean War, and on this basis Sweden was chosen to be Britain’s Protecting Power in Iraq in the aftermath of the Third Arab-Israeli War. Initially, Sweden was deeply reluctant to defend British commercial interests in Iraq, and was also concerned that Britain’s refusal to extend visas for Iraqi diplomatic personnel in London would anger the Arab world and damage Sweden’s position in the region. However, Britain held firm on the necessity of keeping a close watch on commercial interests, and dismissed the visa issue out of hand citing problems of reciprocity. On Sweden becoming Britain’s Protecting Power in Iraq again in 1971, the Swedish government refused to give Britain permission to allow the American State Department to use Britain’s Diplomatic Wireless Service link in order to exchange messages with the US Interests Section at the Belgian embassy in Iraq, thus frustrating Britain’s diplomatic cooperation with her closest ally. Also, when Sweden became Britain’s Protecting Power in Iran following the 1979 Iranian revolution, the Swedish government demanded that the British head of the UK Interests Section exercise restraint over his vocal condemnation of Iran’s human rights record. Such clashes and conflicts over the scope of the authority of the Protecting Power rendered Sweden and Britain to negotiate a formal diplomatic protocol which would clearly spell out a workable arrangement between the two countries when Sweden was once again asked to become Britain’s Protecting Power in Iran following the Salman Rushdie Affair. This led to the signing of the UK/Sweden Agreement on Protection of British Interests in Iran in 1989, a document which has since become a template for Britain’s arrangements with potential Protecting Powers.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
South Korean Workers and the Middle East Construction Boom in the 1970s
Journal of Contemporary Korean Studies
2015 .06
-
신 냉전 시대 중동 이슬람갈등상황의 선교적 함의
ACTS 신학저널
2018 .01
-
‘중동교회사’
Muslim-Christian Encounter
2015 .07
-
스웨덴 식민주의와 스웨덴-노르웨이 연합(1814~1905): 연합 해체 후 탈민족주의의 노르딕 공동체와 평화
서양사연구
2016 .01
-
Anglo-Norman과 Anglo-French의 생태적 배경: 사회, 음운, 어휘적 특징을 중심으로*
영어학연구
2016 .01
-
중동정치의 변화와 이란 핵 협상 타결 이후의 기독교 선교
ACTS 신학저널
2016 .01
-
New Perspectives on the Study of Korean Diplomatic History: Diplomatic Documents of Korea (2009-2018) and Korea’s Foreign Relations and Diplomatic History (2019)
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2024 .06
-
지구화시대의 문화 담론과 독일의 동아시아 인식 — 유교자본주의론을 중심으로 —
사림
2018 .01
-
An Identity Aspect to the "Wars" of Maps in East Asia: Focusing on the East Sea/Sea of Japan Name Debate
Korea Observer
2017 .03
-
In the Middle of Korean Middles
언어학 연구
2022 .10
-
The Changbi Group’s East Asia Theory: Progressive Intellectual Discourses on Korean Unification and East Asian Peace
Korea Journal
2021 .03
-
Towards Environmental History of Modern East Asia
한국과학사학회지
2021 .08
-
동아시아 문명공동체 로드맵 : 역내 인문ㆍ종교ㆍ문화예술 네트워크 제안
양명학
2018 .08
-
에밀리 디킨슨과 동양
현대영미시연구
2019 .01
-
한국 동아시아담론의 현재와 미래 : ‘동아시아공동체론’을 중심으로
통일인문학
2015 .09
-
State Funding of Registered Faith Communities: Discussing Democratic Values in Sweden
인문사회과학연구
2018 .01
-
앵글로-색슨의 이주와 브리튼의 앵글로-색슨화
서양사론
2024 .03
-
<동아시아사> 교육과정 개정 논의를 위한 제언
역사교육논집
2021 .01
-
클린트 이스트우드의 American Sniper에 나타난 제국주의 담론에 대한 탈식민주의적 연구
현대영미드라마
2016 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0