지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.12
- 수록면
- 71 - 97 (27page)
- DOI
- 10.29323/mchina.2022.12.96.71
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis examines the debate between Du yaquan, Editor-in-chief of 『Eastern Miscellany(東方雜誌)』 and Chen duxiu, leading figure in the New Culture Movement-. In Spetember of 1918, Chen raised suspicion and argued through the pages of 『New Youth(新靑年)』, that 『Eastern Miscellany』 is supporting the idea of revival of hereditary monarchy. Du countered this suspicion on 『Eastern Miscellany』 three months later. This exchange of arguments through the pages of their own magazine is often regarded as starting point of ‘East-West (Cultural) Debate’ in later studies.
In 1990s’, studies on Du yaquan began, From the early 1910s’, media activities of Du yaquan were mainly focused on political proposals. He was concentrating on how to establish constitutional politics in China. After the establishment of the Republic of China, Du focused on developing discussions on the relationship between individuals, society and state, during this process he often emphasized the importance of Chinnese civilization. On the other hand, one of the main activities of the New Culture Movement was a critique on Chinese civilization, especially Confucianism political ethics. Among them, Chen duxiu was the one who had the most severe criticism on effect of Confucianism ethics in republic of China.
Previous studies on this debate, mainly focused on how Du and Chen had differed in understanding of the Chinese civilization. In this thesis, by I pointed out that ‘debate’ between Du and Chen was not a result of their diffenrence in understanding of Chinese civilization, but it was rather Chen portraying Du as a person opposed to republican politics in order to emphasize the discussion he had argued through his journalism activities. In this process, Chen formed his argument by ignoring the context of Du’s media activity. Du was one who constantly supported the idea of settling republican politics in China. But in the debate, Du only pointed out the logical fallacies of Chen. In response to Du’s argument, Chen raised the question again and labelled Du as one who opposed republican politics. Image of Du yaquan, as an opposer of Chen duxiu and New culture movement was maintained for a quite long time.
In 1990s’, studies on Du yaquan began, From the early 1910s’, media activities of Du yaquan were mainly focused on political proposals. He was concentrating on how to establish constitutional politics in China. After the establishment of the Republic of China, Du focused on developing discussions on the relationship between individuals, society and state, during this process he often emphasized the importance of Chinnese civilization. On the other hand, one of the main activities of the New Culture Movement was a critique on Chinese civilization, especially Confucianism political ethics. Among them, Chen duxiu was the one who had the most severe criticism on effect of Confucianism ethics in republic of China.
Previous studies on this debate, mainly focused on how Du and Chen had differed in understanding of the Chinese civilization. In this thesis, by I pointed out that ‘debate’ between Du and Chen was not a result of their diffenrence in understanding of Chinese civilization, but it was rather Chen portraying Du as a person opposed to republican politics in order to emphasize the discussion he had argued through his journalism activities. In this process, Chen formed his argument by ignoring the context of Du’s media activity. Du was one who constantly supported the idea of settling republican politics in China. But in the debate, Du only pointed out the logical fallacies of Chen. In response to Du’s argument, Chen raised the question again and labelled Du as one who opposed republican politics. Image of Du yaquan, as an opposer of Chen duxiu and New culture movement was maintained for a quite long time.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 논쟁 이전 杜亞泉의 언론활동
Ⅲ. 『東方雜誌』와 『新靑年』의 논쟁
Ⅳ. 陳獨秀의 ‘재질문’과 논쟁의 의도
Ⅴ. 나가며
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
淸末民初 시기 杜亞泉의 정치개혁 방안- ‘減政主義’를 중심으로
중국사연구
2022 .12
-
제1차 세계대전과 중국 지식인의 서양관 변화
중국근현대사연구
2024 .12
-
≪碧鷄漫志≫譯註(4)
중국어문학
2019 .01
-
≪碧鷄漫志≫譯註(3)
중국어문학
2019 .01
-
월암(月巖) 최일하(崔一河)의 삶과 의식세계 - 은둔관(隱遁觀)을 중심으로 -
한성어문학
2017 .08
-
中?湖南益??俗音??究
문화와 예술연구
2020 .01
-
古朝鮮의 遼西地域 진출과 土着社會의 動向
고조선단군학
2017 .06
-
일본어 “願う”구문의 통사적 특징 -대응하는 한국어 “바라다”구문을 염두에 두고-
일본문화연구
2021 .07
-
일본 시코쿠 헨로의 유래와 시대별 전개 양상
일본문화연구
2022 .04
-
한국어적 발상을 고려한 일본어 자·타동사 교수-학습 방안
일본문화연구
2021 .07
-
韩国菩提庵、向日庵、洛山寺、普门寺观音道场与中国普陀山观音道场文化景观比较研究
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2017 .11
-
심응지(沈應之)의 연행록 『운연과안록(雲煙過眼錄)』 연구
국문학연구
2018 .01
-
반즈케(番付)로 읽는 가나데혼주신구라 - 이미지 표현을 중심으로 -
일본어문학
2018 .01
-
汉韩2020年流行词语对比研究
중국언어연구
2022 .06
-
중국 ‘동서문화 논쟁’이 근대불교에 미친 영향
한국불교학
2024 .05
-
不動心 획득을 위한 孟子의 심리적 메커니즘에 관한 고찰 - 『孟子』「浩然之氣章」의 용기에 대한 논의를 중심으로
동양철학
2021 .01
-
Language Attitude of Ethnic Chinese in Four Southeast Asian Countries
Foreign Languages Education
2017 .01
-
19世纪朝、清文士之间的书籍受赠及对出版文化的影响
한중인문학포럼 발표논문집
2015 .10
-
중국 의학지식 전승의 또 하나의 전통: 송대(宋代) ‘지괴의안(志怪醫案)’의 특징과 의미
의사학
2022 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-912-000313023