지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.103 No.5
- 발행연도
- 2022.11
- 수록면
- 290 - 296 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: The safety, efficiency, and versatility of novel surgical energy devices have been proved by recent studies. This study aims to investigate the impact of surgical energy devices on operative and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery.
Methods: The study group included 80 patients who underwent minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery with a conventional monopolar device and 217 patients with advanced surgical energy devices between August 2015 and December 2017. The propensity score matching for tumor lesion, preoperative level of CEA, and operation technique produced 63 matched pairs.
Results: In patient characteristics, there was no significant difference between the groups after the propensity score matching. The amount of blood loss (72 mL vs. 54 mL, P = 0.123) and conversion cases to another surgery (11.1% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.187) tended to be higher in monopolar group, while operation time and intraoperative complications were not significantly different. The short-term clinical outcomes including time to soft diet, the length of hospital stays, and the morbidity within 30 days after surgery or pathologic outcomes were comparable between the groups. During the median follow-up of 52.9 and 51.1 months in each study group, the 5-year overall survival rates of the monopolar and advanced energy groups were 84.6% and 91.6% (P = 0.276), and the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 78.0% and 84.6% (P = 0.328), respectively.
Conclusion: The use of surgical energy devices based on surgeons’ preference did not show significant impact on operative and long-term outcomes compared with conventional monopolar devices in minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery.
Methods: The study group included 80 patients who underwent minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery with a conventional monopolar device and 217 patients with advanced surgical energy devices between August 2015 and December 2017. The propensity score matching for tumor lesion, preoperative level of CEA, and operation technique produced 63 matched pairs.
Results: In patient characteristics, there was no significant difference between the groups after the propensity score matching. The amount of blood loss (72 mL vs. 54 mL, P = 0.123) and conversion cases to another surgery (11.1% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.187) tended to be higher in monopolar group, while operation time and intraoperative complications were not significantly different. The short-term clinical outcomes including time to soft diet, the length of hospital stays, and the morbidity within 30 days after surgery or pathologic outcomes were comparable between the groups. During the median follow-up of 52.9 and 51.1 months in each study group, the 5-year overall survival rates of the monopolar and advanced energy groups were 84.6% and 91.6% (P = 0.276), and the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 78.0% and 84.6% (P = 0.328), respectively.
Conclusion: The use of surgical energy devices based on surgeons’ preference did not show significant impact on operative and long-term outcomes compared with conventional monopolar devices in minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[Endoscopic & Laparoscopic Surgery] A Propensity Score-matched Analysis of Advanced Energy Devices And Conventional Monopolar Device for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Comparison of Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery in Colorectal Cancer in Elderly
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Synchronous resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis : Propensity score matching of open versus minimally invasive surgery
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2019 .02
-
Minimally invasive surgery for various benign colorectal diseases
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Impact of type of surgery on survival outcome in patients with early gallbladder cancer in the era of minimally invasive surgery : Oncologic safety of laparoscopic surgery
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2016 .04
-
Function-preserving Colorectal Cancer Surgery : Oncologic Safety and Optimal Functional Outcome from Colorectal Cancer Surgery
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2015 .02
-
Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer with articulating device
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2022 .02
-
Quality of Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2017 .02
-
Colorectal Surgery
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
[Colorectal] Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes after Open Conversion in Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Minimally invasive treatments for early colorectal cancer: comparison of endoscopic resection and laparoscopic surgery
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2022 .06
-
Impact of Preoperative Immune-inflammation Status on Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes after Colorectal Cancer Surgery
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in patients over 80 years of age : the morbidity outcomes
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .06
-
Impact of the Learning Curve on the Survival of Abdominal or Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
Cancer Research and Treatment
2021 .01
-
Clinical study of colorectal cancer operation: Survival analysis
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2020 .06
-
Clinical effect of rectus sheath block compared to intrathecal morphine injection for minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: A propensity matched study
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2022 .02
-
Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Following Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2016 .02
-
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Surgical Treatment Patterns of Colorectal Cancer in a Tertiary Medical Facility in Korea
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .05
-
Early And Late Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Comparison of Robotic And Laparoscopic Approach with Propensity Score Matching
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Clinical Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Synchronous Resectable Liver Metastasis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Annals of Coloproctology
2021 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-514-000222083