지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.11
- 수록면
- 146 - 149 (4page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
One of the most notable developments in international politics these days is the seizure of power or proximity to power by the far right. In the United States, the Trump administration was formed in 2016, and the masses, dissatisfied with the results of the 2020 presidential election, attacked the Capitol building on January 6, 2021, the following year. In France, the far-right candidate Marine Le Pen made a second decisive entry into the 2022 presidential election following 2017. Also in Japan, the assassination of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has exposed the relationship between the former Unification Church and influential politicians, drawing attention to the existence of extremely conservative policy agreements.
Is the tilt of politics toward the extreme right an anomaly resulting from the crisis in contemporary society? Using Cas Mudde"s theory of "pathological normalcy," this study proposes that the far right is not a crisis of contemporary society that has occurred suddenly, but is part of democracy, which has been part of the history of political discourse in various countries.
The right and the left can be defined in terms of inequality, the former being natural and positive and considered by the state to be defended, and the latter being artificial and negative and considered a challenge to be overcome. The far right (far right) can be divided into right-wing extremists (extreme right) who deny democracy and the radical right (radical right) who embrace it, the latter being the focus of this study. The radical right has three elements: (1) populism, (2) anti-immigration (nativism), which is a mixture of nationalism and xenophobia, and (3) authoritarianism, which emphasizes law and order. This study will analyze the perspective of nationalism of the extreme right, focusing on (1) populism.
Populism is characterized by a perspective that divides society into two opposing groups, the "pure people" and the "corrupt elite. And their view of politics as something to be done by the general will of the people is in line with classical Western democratic thought. And the xenophobic mixed perspective of nationalism, in which the nation should be inhabited only by the "true people," the native group they refer to as the majority ethnic group, considers foreigners and foreign ideas to be a fundamental threat. This populist, and the far right"s argument from parochial nationalism, composition of the division of the nation by globalization is similar to the mainstream analysis of political science. The image is of a first class of citizens at the top of a pyramid, united with the global elite, and divided from the second class, the majority of the population. Although the global elite is the adversary of the far right, the main adversary and policy issue is the protection of the people"s livelihood and culture through the exclusion of immigrants.
This study compares presidential elections in the United States and France, as well as the lower house election system in Japan, where there are few changes of government, and analyzes how the far right moves closer to the government. As a result, it will become clear that the U.S. system is prone to populism, the French system functions to suppress it, and in Japan, where there is almost no change of government, far-right groups have taken root as supporters of the ruling party.
From the perspective of the "pathological normality" theory, the populist far-right is part of democracy and its destiny. Democracy is based on the principles of freedom and equality, but the fact that democracy must accept the idea of the far right that inequality is positive and should be protected by the state as "freedom of speech" is a constant challenge for democracy.
Is the tilt of politics toward the extreme right an anomaly resulting from the crisis in contemporary society? Using Cas Mudde"s theory of "pathological normalcy," this study proposes that the far right is not a crisis of contemporary society that has occurred suddenly, but is part of democracy, which has been part of the history of political discourse in various countries.
The right and the left can be defined in terms of inequality, the former being natural and positive and considered by the state to be defended, and the latter being artificial and negative and considered a challenge to be overcome. The far right (far right) can be divided into right-wing extremists (extreme right) who deny democracy and the radical right (radical right) who embrace it, the latter being the focus of this study. The radical right has three elements: (1) populism, (2) anti-immigration (nativism), which is a mixture of nationalism and xenophobia, and (3) authoritarianism, which emphasizes law and order. This study will analyze the perspective of nationalism of the extreme right, focusing on (1) populism.
Populism is characterized by a perspective that divides society into two opposing groups, the "pure people" and the "corrupt elite. And their view of politics as something to be done by the general will of the people is in line with classical Western democratic thought. And the xenophobic mixed perspective of nationalism, in which the nation should be inhabited only by the "true people," the native group they refer to as the majority ethnic group, considers foreigners and foreign ideas to be a fundamental threat. This populist, and the far right"s argument from parochial nationalism, composition of the division of the nation by globalization is similar to the mainstream analysis of political science. The image is of a first class of citizens at the top of a pyramid, united with the global elite, and divided from the second class, the majority of the population. Although the global elite is the adversary of the far right, the main adversary and policy issue is the protection of the people"s livelihood and culture through the exclusion of immigrants.
This study compares presidential elections in the United States and France, as well as the lower house election system in Japan, where there are few changes of government, and analyzes how the far right moves closer to the government. As a result, it will become clear that the U.S. system is prone to populism, the French system functions to suppress it, and in Japan, where there is almost no change of government, far-right groups have taken root as supporters of the ruling party.
From the perspective of the "pathological normality" theory, the populist far-right is part of democracy and its destiny. Democracy is based on the principles of freedom and equality, but the fact that democracy must accept the idea of the far right that inequality is positive and should be protected by the state as "freedom of speech" is a constant challenge for democracy.
목차
1. 米仏選挙に⾒るポピュリズム
2. 米仏選挙に⾒るポピュリズムとナショナリズムによる移⺠排斥
3. 急進的右翼の⽬に映る「グローバリゼーションと国⺠国家の危機」
4. トランピズムとアメリカ伝統の「反知性主義(anti-intellectualism)」
5. 米仏の選挙制度の違いと急進的右翼の政権掌握の有無
6. 日本の⾃⺠党と極右、⽇本会議･宗教右派
7. むすびにかえて
参考⽂献
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
대표제 민주주의와 포퓰리즘
시민사회와 NGO
2024 .06
-
The Two Driving Forces of Populism and Democracy in South Korea: A Conceptual, Historical, and Empirical Analysis
Journal of Asian Sociology
2021 .06
-
포퓰리즘 - ‘집단적 아이덴티티’를 건설하는 하나의 방식
한국정치학회보
2022 .12
-
Success of Populism in Recent Elections: Causes, Consequences and Policy Implications
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2017 .03
-
포퓰리즘의 개념과 유형 및 역사적 변화 : 고전 포퓰리즘에서 포스트포퓰리즘까지
한국정치학회보
2020 .03
-
대의민주주의와 국민참여에 관한 소고
공법학연구
2020 .11
-
직접민주주의의 정치철학적 기반에 관한 연구 : 포퓰리즘인가 민주주의인가?
시민과세계
2018 .06
-
20대 대통령 선거의 후보들은 포퓰리스트적 수사를 구사했는가? 19대와의 출마선언문·수락연설문 비교 분석
국제정치연구
2024 .09
-
Existential Threats and Democracy: 2020 Taiwan Presidential Election
EAI 이슈브리핑
2020 .01
-
Results and Implications: The 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
IFANS FOCUS
2016 .11
-
현대 포퓰리즘과 민주주의: 서유럽의 신포퓰리즘과 포스트포퓰리즘을 중심으로
한국정치연구
2023 .02
-
한국 시민의 좌파 권위주의 성향과 우파 권위주의 성향 비교: 얼마나 강하고 어떻게 다른가?
한국정당학회보
2023 .03
-
COVID-19 Crisis and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
IFANS FOCUS
2020 .05
-
포퓰리즘과 민주주의 그리고 시민교육
사회과수업연구
2018 .01
-
What Influences the Differences between Voters who Vote for Populist Candidates and who do not? An Analysis of Effects of Voting Behavior on the Rise of Populist Communication in Mongolia
동북아연구(구 통일문제연구)
2023 .02
-
한국 포퓰리즘의 변화 추이와 영향 요인: 경제적 및 정치적 위기의 관점
평화연구
2020 .04
-
The 2016 US Presidential Election Outcome and Its Implications
IFANS FOCUS
2016 .11
-
Long-distance Democracy and Political Parties in the Indonesian Overseas Elections
Journal of Global and Area Studies
2021 .01
-
포퓰리즘과 민주주의: 양가적 관계 이해하기
시민과세계
2019 .12
-
포퓰리즘, 민주주의 그리고 미디어 : 자유주의적 민주주의와의 규범적 연관을 중심으로
언론과 사회
2019 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-910-000187403