메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Devanny Gumulya (Pelita Harapan University) John Tampil Purba (Pelita Harapan University) Evo Sampetua Hariandja (Pelita Harapan University) Rudy Pramono (Pelita Harapan University)
저널정보
한국디자인학회 Archives of Design Research Archives of Design Research Vol.35 No.3 (Wn.143)
발행연도
2022.8
수록면
7 - 33 (27page)
DOI
10.15187/adr.2022.08.35.3.7

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: This research looks at how ecodesign can support Indonesian creative social enterprises to achieve sustainability by incorporating ecodesign approaches. Previous research has stated that implementing ecodesign leads to better product for market, environment, and superior business performance.
Methods: This is a qualitative exploratory study using a multiple case study approach. The data collection methods include in-depth interviews, a literature review, and data documentation. The findings of this exploratory study serve as the foundation for cross-case analysis. The study is based on ecodesign literature and three case studies of creative social enterprises (CSEs). The study is divided into two stages, the first of which is a literature review to develop the research instrument, followed by expert validation. The second stage consists of gathering primary data on three creative social enterprises, followed by cross-case analysis, and finally validation by sustainable design lecturers as experts. The research subjects are five creative social enterprise entrepreneurs, two managers, and four experts.
Results: We formulated eight ecodesign strategies. Two strategies are good for the planning phase: Design for durability and Design for dematerialization. Six strategies are fit for the development phase: Design for attachment and trust, Design for standardization and compatibility, Design for maintenance and repair, Design for adaptability and upgradability, Design for ease of disassembly and reassembly, and Design for recycling. All three CSEs have not applied the design for maintenance and repair strategy. The study also manages to formulate 27 research and development (R&D) activities that need to be conducted to perform the strategy. According to the findings of the study, CSEs that develop their own sustainable materials, engage in more ecodesign R&D activities than CSEs that use readymade natural materials.
Conclusions: The empirical results show that the ecodesign strategy is very company specific, and regardless of differences, all creative social enterprises demonstrate the ability to develop ecodesigns that improve environmental performance.

목차

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Result
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
6. Limitation & Further Studies
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0